I know exactly how you feel. It's kind of like doing some work you don't feel super motivated to do, though. If you just start doing it/watching it, you'll get sucked in. That works for me at least :P

Vote: FineScanner (iOS)

Vote: Google Drive (Android)

Vote: CamScanner (Android/iOS)

You mean there are still people who turn their PCs off?

Vote: Audible.com

I'm probably not the greatest resource as I would still be using a drip coffee maker if not for a gross earwig infestation like two years ago but we use a 6-cup chemex (I think) with enough grounds to run it through twice.

I was a barista for a fancy coffee company while in grad school. Their espresso was great! One day I hope to be able to make quality espresso at home. Is there any cheaper equipment worth buying to ensure I can one day taste the glory of good espresso at home?

So you're making the exact same argument that the study debunked, but you can "almost guarantee" that the study is wrong based on some armchair thinking? OK then.

If Apple does more of this sort of thing, I might actually respect them one day.

Good job, Apple.

If the company that's almost entirely responsible for the freemium gaming problem is shying away from freemium gaming you know there's something wrong. Good on you, Apple.

Now that's curation in the right direction.

You don't have to push anything while you're running, and because the watch has GPS built-in you don't need your phone with you to record your route/distance/etc.

It's rated as fully dust-resistant and fully water-resistant up to over a meter in depth. I would think you'd be fine. Beyond that, I've scuffed mine against rough surfaces a number of times and I don't see any visible scratches.

You're a cheap ass and in the watch buyers community, you're the exception. even my dumb watches cost twice as much as this.

My new N7 outdoes "retinal", and though my eyes don't care, I do. I can now thumb my nose at those poor deprived iFolk and their pixel poverty. : )

THANK YOU

Thank you for the tip