This, in a nutshell, is the problem with this issue. According to Kaepernick, the purpose of his protest is to “start a conversation,” right? Every article I read about this stresses the importance of an “honest conversation” or an “exchange of ideas,” or an “open dialogue” about race and police brutality. That’s a…

As much as the commentariate here loves to trot out the Wikipedia list of logical fallacies, its disappointing that you aren’t recognizing a very obvious one: the problem with this article is that its built on a false choice.

So, it was ok to give Tebow a rash of shit for his beliefs on the field, but Kapernick gets the ok nod? And it’s ok to raise your fists in the air?Hypocrite much? If it’s too much for these millionaire babies to stand for the national anthem and act like grown AMERICAN men, play it prior to them entering the field so…

So which of his teammates do you think helped him get his hair in cornrows? I’d bet dollars to doughnuts that fucker hasn’t worn his hair that way a day in his life until reminding the world he’s part black became a way to extend his 15 minutes a little longer.

So basically, “Agree with Kap or shut the hell up”. It’s good to see free speech and protests are one way arguments.

Yeah, Samer, you tell him. Here in the real world, my department at work isn’t being held back because of my protests for child slavery, but rather because I’m reading this instead of working.

After the weeks and months of committing so much time to train you’d think these people would show a little gratitude.

Classic example of overtraining.

Norfolk Southern Railway, the company which told organizers that there would be no traveling trains during the marathon, is looking into how a train traveled through the marathon.

I sport a Fu Man Chu mustache. Appropriation?

You could almost hear the mental checklist of “Shit that Will Get Me Fired” being run down.

I mean, the NCGOP has a point towards the end. It’s kind of amazing that an entire state gets sporting events removed despite these programs having zero involvement with the bathroom bill, yet Baylor and Penn State knowingly facilitated actions on par or greater than it and got slaps on the wrist.

I should’ve said “Legal economics”, which makes no sense but you get my point.

Oh, I stand corrected. ‘Dripping with disdain’ is lost in transcription. If you’re seeing that in his words here, it’s your imagination. He’s doing his job. You’d hire him if you were a UV exec reading this with your fingers crossed.

“I’d personally like to hear Hamilton’s take since he understands how finance works”

Gawker Media’s editors and writers have always come off as entitled children, but this interview makes that even more apparent. These questions are insulting and childish and a great way to piss off your new owners. I think towards the end it finally clicked, they all are ungrateful brats with their heads shoved so…

A) Just because something is true and accurate doesn’t make it safe to keep posting even after sued (No one disputed that wasn’t Hulk Hogan screwing his friend’s wife).

This is unbelievable. All it proves is the children who populated gawker media bloggerjism, the self absorbed, millennial snowflakes who think the world revolves around them, the ones who relentlessly claimed their right to post idiot, defamatory, unsubstantiated lawsuitbait gossip under the umbrella of “journalism”…

I am not defending Univision’s actions because we will NEVER have the whole truth about the subject but these “Gawker is innocent guys! Come on! Stop picking on me!!!” posts have to stop. It’s embarrassing. You deal in smut, you eventually get repercussions. Let Gawker die please. Find a way to channel all this crap…

Is Editorial Union Gabrielle's older sister?