Which are solvable?

You monster!

Hear Hear! Why can’t people understand this. It’s so obvious. You revise a theory it’s because the theory is wrong. But young kids today just don’t get it. You wouldn’t believe the number of people I have to deal with everyday that claim gravity is still a thing. I’m like, “Ah .... Einstein had to revise the theory of…

Interesting. I haven’t looked at a Schwartzchild graph in awhile, but I remember the radius changing dramatically with mass. Is there a point where the region of gas is larger than the radius but still allows for gaseous states. That makes sense at least, but I’d like to look the numbers up again. Thanks for the…

How exactly do they propose a gas cloud, even a dense one, skipping right past star formation stage? I’d be more inclined to believe super-duper massive stars with infinitesimal life-spans then it just phase transitioning right past star-hood. At least without a proposed mechanism for doing that.

Nope. I did. I was there at the beginning and told God to go watch a movie while I created the universe. He came back and took all the glory by dictating a best seller just like Stan Lee, but really it was me. Prove me wrong.

I’m here to say Coke is better than Pepsi. I can’t understand why everytime I bring it up on Pepsi’s home forum people seem upset. So strange. They think I’m a troll.

Providing good predictive power is that theory?

The holocaust museum has a mission statement well beyond the operation of a museum. It has a clear agenda and uses it’s funds to move where possible in that direction. Giving them money is easy. What does the 9/11 museum seek to do with my money?

I don’t understand how to use this and I’m probably going to lose a lot of pieces

Is there a way to play Steam games on it?

Could we start now to curb arguments in the coming years that the trend toward hotter climate is false because after this pattern we won’t hit record heat again for a decade? I can already see the argument fomenting that this was a blip because of el niño ignoring that the natural cooling between the cycle is still…

Someone on a Bernie post in Gawker has over 1000 stars ... that just seems exhausting.

Imma play the dick devil’s advocate.

“Because chemicals” is the worst form of self-hate.

I don’t even need to follow your threads to know you are right. Stars galore for reputation.

My thinking, and I seem to be wrong, was that you weren’t using a stream of light with different states. Any photon still only has this property in one state, so the amount of information in the photon doesn’t change.

Interesting. I stand corrected. I thought it was just a property with a state, not that you could use all possible states to encode information. Like finding out that blond hair is possible doesn’t change the amount of information you can encode in hair.

Doubtful. It just increased the complexity of the information, not the amount of it. I think.

These are the kind of adjustments to theory that can lead to revolutionary ideas. Like the prism leading to discovery of habitable exoplanets. We may not know the implications for half a century, but small changes in understanding fundamental building blocks can propagate outward at tremendous speed.