It's a distinction that only people putting their slant on it will find meaningful. Most people won't.

And it’ll be interesting to see how many people tune in to see a bunch of white men with the same predictable background when The Grand Tour hits the air.

This will all end in a lawsuit of course and the car’s electronics will show whether a movie was or was not being played. While commenters on Gawker are convinced that “don’t blame the victim” is like an actual legal doctrine, it isn’t. And if he was watching a movie, it’s definitely going to hurt the case of family…

Yep, it took a lot of courage to bury that apology in something like the 9th paragraph of a blog post whose title concentrated only on the wrongdoings of Rolling Stone.

You're absolutely right. She buried her “apology” in something like the 9th paragraph of a blog post whose title spoke only about the wrongdoings of Rolling Stone. An actual apology would have been given equal dignity to her original post.

“I admire you for always critically examining your own work—both in this case and beyond.”

I feel like I’m picking the wrong bottle when my tasting notes for the 2007 Rioja I had the other night are:

And what makes you think that any “big check” the US hypothetically cuts will be used on refugees?

I’m not sure you’ll feel the same way once the people you’re arguing in favor of get an apocalyptic device on their hands.

You'd also have to look into what the make up is of the people who apply to law school in the first place. (I.e., what does the pool look like?)

There are probably even less when you look at the route judges typically take to take there: top end schools all the way, partners at big law firms for a while.

In other news, company that doubles down when it has a power disparity in its favor to destroy people is unhappy when a person with a power disparity in his favor doubles down to destroy company.

It’s really remarkable how quickly humanity broke the planet after the industrial revolution. Apparently that’s the price to pay when most business decisions are solely based on whether they will make the company more money.

I'd buy this argument more if his religion could somehow be divorced from the concepts of hatred to gays and to women. Of course it can't. And that's how his religion is practiced in all the countries of the world that practice his religion.

Get real. Peter Thiel didn't invent the facts of the lawsuit or award the damages to Hogan. Maybe Gawker should get a new General Counsel ... Someone who can actually manage risk unlike Hearher Dietrick.

They’re also free to be sued each and every time they eject a student. One of these students will win eventually and, when that student does, it will be for a whole ton of money.

Its called normalizing, its been studied over and over again, its instinctual and normal reaction, and when are we going to accept this as a fact?

The great internet outrage machine is great at having anonymous people sit behind their computers and tear things down ... it’s not so good at coming up with quality replacements for the things it tears down.

After getting 60,000 clicks yesterday (and the revenue associated with that) from a blog post that showed text messages where Depp’s assistant purportedly acknowledged that Depp had attacked Amber Heard (http://jezebel.com/alleged-texts-…), it turns out that those messages were totally fabricated with no date or time…

After getting 60,000 clicks yesterday (and the revenue associated with that) from a blog post that showed text messages where Depp’s assistant acknowledged that Depp had attacked Amber Heard (http://jezebel.com/alleged-texts-…), it turns out that those messages were totally fabricated of course with no date or time…