Hey telephones are a proud, courageous people who were here a long time before the internet took their land. We should celebrate them by misconstruing what words mean.

As a Patriots fan I enjoy that not only does the team enrage you but the idiot media guys that I don't read also enrage you.

"Excellent, sir. Lobster stuffed with tacos."

I think it was Barnwell at Grantland that used to criticize coaches for going against the odds when punting or going for it. When the coach gambled and won, he basically would spend 500 words saying "yeah, but still" like a child.

Pete Carroll (walking over to Lynch and Hauschka): You know who else was ready to ride? The 9/11 hijackers, if they actually existed.

"So, who's that dweeb with the forehead?"

Simmons must have an offer to become the head scout of the New York Mets

So... what you're saying is: success doesn't depend on who you replace Drew Bledsoe with, just replace him.

Well, he got flagged 15 yards for that, so....yes, they do?

I love Gawker media as a whole, but they sometimes lock in on a narrative & go out of their way to prove it. How can you possibly blame the league for that hit?

thank you. This such a stupid post by deadspin

Shouldn't surprise anyone that the NFL would tackle someone like that. Just a year ago the NFL murdered Odin Lloyd in cold blood. Because we call every action by every human in the league the NFL...

There's nothing wrong with a good old-fashioned rant. And I don't care if it's more emotional than logical. I'd just like it better if it wasn't the same rant I read last week (and the week before that, and the week before that . . . )

The only problem with these screeds against second-tier sports (and sports journalism) types is that each has to be more hysterical than the last for there to be any way to differentiate them at all. Every one of these columns boils down to:

Brad Stevens. No doubt.

More like No Balance, amirite?

You hate to see a newspaper get it wrong like this. This kind of careless headline really makes you doubt their credibility. How did this front page get by the editors? I know they jam a ton of work into a tight timeline and everything, but you'd think they'd catch something so glaringly obvious—you spell "filthy"…