That's supercute. But I think you meant "abusement" not "amusement", if that is even a real word.
generosa
generosa
Brag porn. We can call what he did brag porn. He prob wanted other dudes to be all jealous of all of the hot sex he has with his hot girlfriend or something.
Everyone has different experiences.
That has been my experience as well. And, yes, there should always be room for pudding. 2/2.
There is an enormous amount of information out there telling people that drugs are horrible and detailing how easy it is to get addicted. Many of these campaigns are directed at kids, teens, and young adults. But some, like the recent CNN one, is aimed at adults as well. In my line of work, I see the downside of that.…
Prevent people from getting hooked? Probably not. Drug abuse and addiction will always exist. But I think that by being realistic with ourselves and others (especially kids who are old enough to handle such conversations!) and going the harm reduction route rather than the criminalization/war on drug users route we'll…
It is kind of a deal breaker when you try to have a conversation with someone and say "you know, it bothers me when you do this and this" and they immediately turn it around on you. Like somehow you're the bad person for even bringing up the fact that, I don't know, she keeps you on the phone for hours talking about…
NOPE. Especially when you know how it feels. Ugh. And to be displayed in such a public way?? This is pretty bad stuff.
It was really, really, really hard not to look at the Aubrey Plaza ones. Not going to lie. But, yeah. What a fucking asshole.
^that's all you, buddy. Sorry you can't stand looking at yourself in the mirror.
PA2SKsilentstone7
Nope. Just a narcissistic asshole.
And suggesting that sometimes women just deserve to get raped because they don't take enough precautions against it?
Oh! And supporting the shooting of black people so long as they are tall enough and weigh enough?
Cool. So you'll just be fucking random people who didn't consent then?
That is how every single contract works. Her publicist could at best make a stern phone call. Vogue wouldn't give a shit though.
YES. Because when you agree to sit still long enough for a major media outlet to take pictures of you, you are agreeing to allow said outlet full control over those images. Fuck, Vogue could've published those photos without any retouching if they felt like it. Why? Because they made an agreement with Lena Dunham to…
Yes. It would be fine. Why? Because she knew she was doing a photo shoot for fucking Vogue magazine, a magazine that is published worldwide. It is obvious to anyone with a brain that those photos will be seen by a whole shit ton of people. Photos on a private cellphone not so much. How do you not get this very basic…
You're absolutely wrong.
Since the photos of Lena Dunham were meant for publication in a magazine, they cannot be considered private. However, the photos stolen from the phones of Jennifer Lawrence, Kate Upton, Ariana Grande etc. cannot by any means be considered anything other than private. That is the main difference. Though I wouldn't…