He did this before, so the whole "if he's any kind of decent" thing isn't a factor. He shouldn't have gotten into bed with a woman without telling her.

It changes when you read the part in the story where this guy did this to another woman previously. He had no excuse for getting in a bed with another woman after the first time.

Um, somebody has some rape fantasies. As in, you LOVE it when women get sexual violated by other guys so you can blame them.

Dear people who whine about being blamed for victim-blaming:

Go back to Reddit and whine/jerk off there.

Maybe you should dump the pretense that you're not a victim blaming predator who lets other men do horrible shit to women.

You're a victim blaming predator who is okay with other men preying on women.

You're fan voting an asshole, probably because you jerk off to the stuff she blames on victims.

Yet nobody———including YOU, asshole———-blames any other victim but women.

You need to get punched. Repeatedly. Stop being a victim blaming asshole.

Actually, assholes seem to have the idea they're not sexist scumbags if nobody notices they only attack victimized women.

I guess slut shaming isn't slut shaming when it's somebody you don't like, is it?

She doesn't know anything about rape, either. What good does it do to take precautions against the rarest for of rape? Why is she ignoring the most common kind?

For somebody preaching how to live in the real world you seem curiously ignorant of how rape actually happens. Are you REALLY bitching at women to fear dark alleys while you ignore how many rapes are actually committed by acquaintances? How come you arrogant little rape apologists never do your research?

Oh, but don't you know? It's NOT victim blaming unless she she says, "I", "victim" and "blame" in a sentence, in front of witnesses.

Sorry, sparky, but you got snotty with somebody who was skeptical of this bullshit, when you weren't even aware, it seems, that this guy had done it before———-a fact that does, indeed, make excusing this guy's actions "bullshit".

Um, diddums, YOU'RE the one who's trying to simultaneously minimize what he did (because ONLY YOU know the facts of this particular secure assault) while maximize the medical angle.

So I guess you can't read? Or was the story too tasty for you to pay attention to complicated shit like HE DID THIS BEFORE THEREFORE IT WAS HIS JOB TO NOT ENDANGER SOMEBODY ELSE.

Has your stupidity been measured? You are blaming the victims by saying that the crime would not have occurred if they had not done something stupid. In reality, the criminals who stole these photos committed the crime. When you blame the victim, you leave the offender free in every way——-free of criticism, of…

Um, when you omit a couple of steps so you can minimize responsibility for sexual assault, hell yeah. Also, you're speculating without evidence.