How me taking that to the track help me get to work faster?  I’m not going that fast for amusement i’m doing it because I want to arrive more quickly. 

She wasn’t in St. Louis when she was pulled over.

I generally speaking only drive 120 if I’m going on a long road trip. (which is what the subject of the article was doing) There is one particular stretch of highway in town where I will go that fast but that’s because the lanes are segregated, there are no on or off ramps, which means there’s no where for the cops to…

I don’t murder people, because I don’t want to inflict suffering and loss on another human being. Not because murder is against the law...

You’re gosh darned right about that! Donald Trump is a moral disgrace.

That was a joke.  My friends and I used to say that in high school.  We were not serious.  We did speed a lot though.  Also, I don’t think you know what the word inevitable means. 

You site the fact that the activity is against the law as though that is supposed to be somehow meaningful me. I do not care if it is against the law or not. I do not form my value judgements as to what activities I will and will not participate in based upon what the law says. It’s entirely irrelevant.

“You are the one breaking the law, so I think I am in the right here while you defend your ridiculous speeding habit that does endanger others (no matter how F1 cool you think you are).”

I do adhere to them as I would any law there to keep people safe. Which is to say, if ignore it completely and substitute my own judgement.

That’s precisely what I am dong. 90 mph is an entirely reasonable speed, I do it everyday twice a day at a minimum.

Yeah I don’t agree with that. It is not a victimless crime. I just don’t think the posted speed limits are not set based upon the design speed on high ways. In a residential neighborhood where someone could step out in front of your car that is a completely different story.  Or in heavy traffic or in the rain or in…

Every person who ever goes even 1 mph faster than the posted speed limit is a criminal.

C&I Driving is their analog. Which is a misdemeanor.

Driving 20-25 over the speed limit in Missouri is not Reckless Driving. Missouri has no such statute. Missouri merely requires one to “drive at a rate of speed so as not to endanger the person or property of another”.  Which brings me back to my original point. Whether or not she was endangering the person or property…

Yeah, so I don’t live in a place with one local police department. There are probably close to 100 of them and you still need to be going at least 20 over for them to even bother to pull you over. Even the municipalities renowned for speed traps don’t bother, there’s always someone going faster than 20+ to pull over.

I knew what you meant. At least where I live, you have to be doing 20-25 over just to get pulled over in the first place. Even then you’d probably just get a warning.

Actually, no, it’s completely and utterly reckless. Our highway system was inspired by the German highway system but it’s not constructed the same way.

But like didn’t they get back together after the domestic violence? so doesn’t that reinstate him as a salty-ex rather than a stalker? I don’t know what the protocol is here.