fr33kye
PlatinumGraves
fr33kye

You sound insane. If you're job is making jokes, the attempt to make people laugh is the excuse. You're not always gonna get huge laughs, and even when you do someone somewhere might get their feelings hurt, but the attempt is what's justified, and the attempt is what should be defended. If every comedian was chris

So every comedian should conform to the way they did things because any other way hurts people's feelings? Nah that's completely ridiculous and I think you know that. I doubt this guy was even funny but sometimes comedians make fun of people. I'm sure it must have sucked, though dehumanizing is a bit of an

This is all great, I've seen a few of them before. The second one is so good it makes my head hurt. I just love those two characters and the colors of the world. Same goes for the two in the fourth!

Something about protecting people from the thoughts and ideas of others, idk I still don't have it, but you did a great job of making an important point! It's important that we not dismiss dissent by labeling it as ignorant or unacceptable. Especially now when social issues are brought up every day and I keep seeing

The entire first half of your comment is complete bullshit I'm sorry. I edited my comment because I didn't want the fight but people don't seem to realize how wrong what you said actually is. You dismiss their perspective as just a "boy's club mentality" then claim their virgins(which is apparently a very bad thing

Goooooood post. I don't know if the patriot act is the right comparison though. There's a better comparison out there I just can't think of it.

It's not restriction of free speech on a government level! However it kind of does go against it on a conceptual level, which is what I think people are referring to. Idk if it's the biggest deal but I think it's hard to say it doesn't go against free speech as a concept(that wouldn't mean we would throw out any and

Edit: nvm.

Edit: I don't want to be a troll lol. I just strongly disagree with the some parts of your comment.

Yea not really. It is true however that kids are being raised playing games on touch screen devices instead of gameboys and nintendo consoles. And it is true that the audience that bought the innovative games that allowed the ds to sell over 150 million, games like brain age and nintendogs, have kind of moved to

It's up to the developers whether ps plus is needed for free to play. I think it depends on whether they use sony's servers or not.

This wasn't nearly as awful as I had initially expected. Though of course the onus is not on grand theft auto to increase the presence of women in any way, and no the game your describing at the end is not the one they wanted to make. Still not a bad article though. Glosses over the elements of masculinity that

"Let me spell it out for you since you don't seem to get it. Without a successful Vita TV, not only does Tearaway not exist, but the Vita itself continues to wither and die" I disagree, but it doesn't really matter because a successful vita tv, is not a successful vita, it's simply a successful vita tv. First party

Listen, more games to play is good, and I love to see that happening already with the vita, but I just wanted more for the console is all. Wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, it's inevitable anyway.

"The installed base is not growing quickly enough, due to a lack of games." If only sony had their own studios to invest in the hardware. The unique features it has over the vita amounts to playing on tv. Let me spell t out for you since you still don't seem to get t. n the world of a successful vita tv, Tearaway

I don't care whether you take the time to look for the answer. I've explained it to a lot of people in this thread. If you want to know, just look.

An xbox 360 with kinect and no 360 controller IS A DIFFERENT SYSTEM. I really don't care what you think is a gimmick or not, but it is a different platform. An xbox 360 that only has kinect support isn't an xbox 360, but a vita tv has far more potentially damaging effects than a kinect only xbox.

I've already expressed to multiple people why you're wrong. I'm sorry if I'm not interested in rewriting it. Look around if you want, or don't, I honestly don't care.

No it isn't a wiiu. I'm surprised you can't see that. Do you at the very least understand why someone who wanted to see what the touchscreen on the wiiu could do, would have reason to pretty much abandon all of that? A system with completely different capability, is a different system. Rockband peripherals are just

Like i said to someone else, bad design is not an argument against any feature. And you're very confused if you think there aren't many many ds and 3ds games that require you to use the touch screen.