Meh, they’re just still pissed that despite all their shilling, Ghostbusters’16 died at the Box Office and are taking it out on any film that did better.

Reminds me of that Streetfighter game that was based on the movie, or even the comic adaptation of Constantine that was based on the movie adaptation of Hellblazer.

Still pushing the narrative that more people wanted the Ghostbusters reboot then Suicide Squad despite the box office saying otherwise I see. Sorry, men and women of color can be in box office hits without being (or perhaps because they are not) automatically cast as the uneducated loud member of the ensemble, get…

“So, this is about whether the accused rapist is being punished in the proper manor?”

Not to mention that Brown would not let the accused present evidence in his defense. Regardless of whether a rape occurred or not, this is a pretty blatant example of illegally railroading a student by a university to get an outcome they wanted.

Just going to quote this section of the original Washington Post article which was strangely not quoted here:

Well said. I will leave you with this quote about how when a troll responds to you with insults and name-calling, it really means you have won the argument: http://jezebel.com/1787244309

I know in Australia, policies of mandatory sentencing has lead to an over-representation of minorities (particularly indigenous native Australians) in prison.

I think it is obvious she is guilty. Amanda Knox was found guilty by a court of law. Furthermore the rate of false accusations for murder tends to incredibly low (approximately 4% according to one study) so it is statistically likely that she is a murderer.

Aww, I’m sorry that asking for any evidence that the complainant was drunk when there is nothing in the article stating that she was or asking for the citations (and no, “google it” doesn’t count) that you used to claim it was statistically likely the African-American male is a rapist detracted from your obvious glee…

Aww, I’m sorry that asking for any indications that the complainant was drunk when there is nothing in the article stating that she was or asking for the citations (and no, “google it” doesn’t count) that you used to claim it was statistically likely the African-American male is a rapist detracted from your obvious…

Lol, NewakinjaBanned, good to see you have proven I am in the right. As soon as a racist responds to a person of color’s anger with insults, name-calling and cowardly dismissals, that person of color knows she is RIGHT. Racists cannot abide when we push back.

Lol, NewakinjaBanned, good to see you have proven I am in the right. As soon as a racist responds to a person of color’s anger with insults, name-calling and cowardly dismissals, that person of color knows she is RIGHT. Racists cannot abide when we push back.

Lol, NewKinjaBannded, Lol, good to see you have proven I am in the right. As soon as a racist responds to a person of color’s anger with insults, name-calling and cowardly dismissals, that person of color knows she is RIGHT. Racists cannot abide when we push back.

That’s nice. Now can you provide the evidence that she was drunk, because nothing in the article states that she was.

Lol, good to see you have proven I am in the right. As soon as a racist responds to a person of color’s anger with insults, name-calling and cowardly dismissals, that person of color knows she is RIGHT. Racists cannot abide when we push back.

Lol, says the poster so desperate to portray an African-American as a rapist that she posted comments about how drunk sex is rape when she was fully aware such comments were utterly irrelevant to the case that there is no evidence that the woman was drunk.

Ok, so given that there is no evidence whatsoever that the woman was drunk and you yourself have been forced to deny claiming the woman was drunk, that means your comment “drunk people are unable to consent” has no relevance to the case being discussed whatsoever. So why make the comment in the first place, unless you…

Oh, I see. So drinking = automatically drunk. I eagerly look forward to every person driving home from a dinner party or bar being automatically booked for drunk driving because they had a glass of wine under your interpretation of the word “drunk”. Unless of course you only want to apply that definition when…

That’s nice. Now can you provide the evidence that she was drunk, because nothing in the article states that she was.