It’s sad for the person who cares more about looks than how it sounds.
fiberman
fiberman
a wall of worthless monkey jpegs.
Imagine going blind and having the last thing you saw be a wall of monkey jpegs.
Hopefully they are picking places that will deliver without nickel and diming them to death on top of expecting them to tip.
On one hand 100% fuck Door Dash for not properly paying its ‘employees’.
Order from someone who delivers with their own people?
Personally, this is more evidence confirming that my decision not to use DoorDash is the correct one for me personally. I know there are people out there using it (this article would not exist otherwise) and good for them, but I don’t have that kind of money to blow.
I resolved this issue about a year ago. I placed a DD order and realized I did not leave a tip. Went through their dogshit customer service line to get a generous tip applied (30%) only for a partial order to show up. I called DD about the issue and they offered to refund me $15. The total order was north of $60. I…
See, this is why I go with Uber. You can put a tip on before delivery but you can take it away later if they do a poor job. I work somewhere that is not convenient for going and getting food and on days I forget to bring lunch I often order delivery. On Saturday I ordered pizza with the instructions “Come into the…
Considering the workers, similar to servers, can actually lose money on deliveries when no tip is given, I am not surprised they are starting to pick and choose which orders they are taking.
Colbert put it best last night: We can’t be bothered to pay our employees, so we’re gonna shame if you don’t pay them for us.
Ah yes, laws. The natural enemy of tech bro billionaires.
As someone that has worked a bunch of development projects, the tech bro cities get incredibly annoying. A rich person’s ideal city is generally an exercise in weird architecture. Society’s ideal city is focusing how to save water, generate electricity, grow produce, resilient structures, and efficient public transit.…
Andreessen recently published a manifesto about his vision for the future. I don’t know about you, but these days, when I see the word “manifesto,” I immediately think of news stories that begin with, “Neighbors described him as a strange, quiet man, and had often expressed concerns about him” and end with, “Before…
He’s dangerous only if he can get a bunch of dumb fellow pols and gullible voters to support his bullshit no matter how extreme it is and how much it will hurt people they actually know and...
They want to roll the clock back much further. After the end of no-fault divorce will come the push for coverture, where the wife becomes functionally the property of her husband. Ending no-fault divorce would likely backfire though, and tank the marriage rate even more. Women are already fleeing marriage in droves.
I agree. It’s not about how ridiculous we happen to think his ideas are. It’s about how many American voters will dutifully fall in line behind this kind of thinking in future elections.
Listen to what he believes. He’s dangerous.
Right now, in the U.S., only 8% of new car sales are EV, but given the massive markups and general manufacturer-imposed price-unaffordability of new EVs, that 8% is probably an iceberg tip on top of actual pent-up demand.
Shocking that people aren’t wild about $60k (at 7% interest!) cars with limited, often-broken charging infrastructure and insane repair and maintenance costs.