This is a gross and pathetic article. Really a far reach here. If this is the case, then all Muslims are terrorist and all white people are white supremacist etc. etc.

That is a horrifically bad idea. All it does is encourage the company’s executives to put pressure on management to hire any minority and as we saw in the lead up to 2008, assuming people will do the right thing versus the easy thing never works out that well.

Capitalist feminism is hilarious.

This man blazed his step-granddaughter, so this shit doesn’t surprise me...

WHOM he groomed her as a child.

He messed with his step great grand daughter AND I PUT HIM ON THE LIST. She was at the time a very pretty innocent black girl just out from Uni. The age gap was like 30 years. And he groomed her as a child.

sorry brah, flashbacks don’t exist, nor does lsd stay in your spine, or cause insanity, etc. any other nonsense propaganda from the 60's :P

I hope McDonald’s is next. I can’t tell if flipping D-grade beef patties on a filthy griddle for $9/hr. is a shitty job no one but teenagers should be making a career of!

So basically, if the Air Force is correct, this isn’t any bigger of a story if they got caught drinking and driving. In other words what they did on their off duty time isn’t a national security crisis as the article’s tone would like us to believe.

So they weren’t tripping while on duty. I don’t give a fuck what kind of drugs people use when they aren’t at work.

According to the Air Force, none of the airmen used drugs while on the job.

This isn’t a subject that needs much digging. Its pretty clear clear CNN dislikes the president and this is an illustration of their contrarian nature when it comes to his decisions. Here’s a link to both articles (the middle is just a fact). They are both opinion pieces selected by CNN for publishing that don’t…

“I can’t emphasize how little Musk’s dumb website would define me, but whatever.”

Now, far more cynically, they just set up two competing sources. One panders to one side of an argument, the other panders to the other. And consumers lap it up, consuming far more, bringing in far more sponsorship, than journalistic integrity, that also challenged their beliefs, ever did.

Ok, but is his statement accurate? Is that website staffed by rich Berkeley kids? I’m far from a Musk fan but I try to be reasonable.

Spinning a negative light on a website that would be beneficial for any honest media outlet kind of shows that you might not be an honest media outlet.

I’d argue Elon gets plenty of good press. Hes not wrong on the greater picture though. Since the article does its best to drag Trump in here’s one of my favorite examples of how the media handles people it just doesn’t like.

He seems to be suggesting that the profit motive (journalists selling out to advertisers), is the problem. Welcome to socialism, comrade Musk!

For someone who doesn’t care what he thinks you REALLY seem to care what he thinks.