etruscanraider
EtruscanRaider
etruscanraider

Just one more proof of the psychotic competitive nature of Michael Jordan. You have to crazy as well as crazy good to push it every time down the floor for 82 games.

On board 100%.

He cuts against the grain because he’s bought into the idea that the Dark Side is stronger and he tries to be extra dark and evil because he knows that there is still good in him. He’s still got one food in the light and its driving him mad that he can’t shed what he sees as weakness.

WOOHOO!

If Mikkelsens is Magus, does that mean he’d also potentially play Adam Warlock? I’d be down with that.

Good news is that Snyder’s voyeurism may have saved him. Taking another look I notice there’s no boobs on the costume, a detail I’m certain he wouldn’t omit if Robin was female. So its probably not Carrie Kelley.

thank God.

I hope you’re right. That they’re just appealing to people remembering Dick Grayson. I really do hope you’re right.

I just have so little faith in Snyder.

He did but when was the last time you saw Dick Grayson in shorts? I know there’s a brief appearance of the original costume in the Brave and the Bold cartoon but that was a show that deliberately played off the Silver Age. Kelley was in shorts for the Dark Knight Returns animation just a few years ago.

It makes me genuinely worried because Robin has rarely appeared in film or animation in shorts with one notable exception: Carrie Kelley. So if the Robin in the DCCU is Carrie Kelley, which fits with Snyder’s devotion to Miller, and if Kelley is dead it just reopens the violence against wound yet again. I just hope

Has anyone else pointed out that Robin costume pictured has rubber hot pants?

So we have Batman in a hulking rubber suit when he isn’t borrowing the Iron Man armor, the Batmobile has giant machine guns on it, Superman is wearing a chain mail onsie because underwear on the outside is lame, but when it comes to Robin,

What are the odds that Ezra is Supreme Leader Snoke?

The “women cannot be trusted” trope brought to absurd levels. Here’s the logical progression:

Woman accuses man of grabbing her.

Assumption 1: Women are untrustworthy and false.

Conclusion 1: Woman must have grabbed man.

Video shows man grabbing woman.

Assumption 2: Assumption 1 is an unassailable fact.

Conclusion 2: Video

“films and graphic novels that delve into human emotion, development, and realistic portrayals”

Those are exactly the elements missing from MoS and BvS. Its something I’ve seen consistently pointed out in the reviews. There’s really no development happening and Snyder has apparently feels that scowling and

The real problem with the Fountainhead and the rest of Rand’s odes to creators is that ultimately the created products don’t really belong to their creators but to humankind.

Fountainhead is about a guy who blows up a public housing project because it wasn’t built the way he wanted. The problem is that the building

Hilary come November....

Now we know what Luke has been doing...... Running the galaxy’s hottest nightclub! Studio 54 can’t compare with Luke’s Intergalactic Discotheque!

Compared to what the armed forces would have likely done in those three(!) situations even doing things as well as they possibly could seems like the Avengers are pretty good are keeping people out of harms way.

That tiny logo and tear-drop eyes are wonderfully Ditko.

But killing is never framed as a moral question to Superman. The question of how he should treat his foes is never even raised. He’s never presented with a reason not to kill Zod, never given a reason why he wouldn’t want to do it, or that he’d regret that decision.

It isn’t just that Superman killed Zod, its how it was set up and how it played out. We’re never given a reason for why Superman would want to not kill Zod or avoid killing in general. We never see him grapple with big moral questions. So the argument that “Superman needs to kill a guy to know that killing is wrong”