You know what, you’re right. I’ve gotten so used to reading ‘a parent bought a gun for a child’ and that is what my eyes read. Thank you.

If it serves the Kremlin, Tuck-yo Rose is all for it.

I only mention the No Child Left Behind as a provision schools are using to place kids with limited forms of “differences” within classrooms. Without proper funding and knowing the number of kids within the school system that are in need of an “Aide”, it’s really hard to draw a conclusion about why the parents were…

No shit. It is a real “you keep using that word” moment. If a six year old can get it then it was not secured in any way whatsoever.

His parents explained in a statement that the gun was a legal purchase of the boy’s mother and secured in the home.

? It seems the mother bought herself a gun and didn’t store it securely.

Oh, I meant it was weird that the parents were the ones acting as his aids. From the teacher I heard from on this, it’s usually considered poor practice to not have another support person aid the child if they need constant individual attention (as opposed to more limited class room aiding).

Sorry but if the child was so learning disabled that he required parental presence at school to thrive, how did he happen to get a gun that they claim was securely stored? Something is not adding up. The parents are covering up their negligence is the most likely explanation. And they ruined this woman’s life and…

“His parents explained in a statement that the gun was a legal purchase of the boy’s mother and secured in the home.”

*6 year old

Since we don’t know the nature of the disability, whether emotional or intellectual (leaving physical off the table since the kids actions limit that option), mainstreaming of children has become more common since “No Child Left Behind”. The parents might have been there as a measure due to understaffing or because…

His parents explained in a statement that the gun was a legal purchase of the boy’s mother and secured in the home.

“secured in the home”

“[T]he gun was [. . .] secured in the home.”

Something not adding up in the parent’s story - which is no surprise since they are responsible for the teacher getting shot - and have to be scrambling to avoid serious charges.

Pigs gonna pig. Kudos to the very rare cop doing his job properly

The video ends with cuffs going on.

“I’m not going to watch the video, but I’m going to mindlessly speculate.”

32 years... should have retired long ago and now his pension is likely in jeopardy.

Cops are allowed to lie to people, the officer should have just faked he was turning it off & let Drunky McCorruptCop think he was safe to be unguarded in what he sd & did. He may have implicated himself in something worse to be charged w/.