“Cover what?”
“Cover what?”
When virtually all of the bloggers are solidly in the bag for one candidate in the primary- to the point of delusion, really. Bernie had lost as of Super Tuesday, if you follow politics and the numbers enough, yet the coverage here was all about Bernie’s chances! - then don’t expect your beloved candidate’s opponent…
Not to mention that they don’t seem to have done the slightest bit of research, given that one of their questions is this:
That’s the way I remembered it. Hillz doesn’t like us!?
On Super Tuesday the coverage here was Bernie wins in Oklahoma. No, I’m not kidding. And that a Kardashian thought Super Tuesday was a sale.
I like Anna and Jezebel too...but I cannot for the life of me see where HRC would have benefited from an interview here. During the primaries the coverage on both Gawker (and you can’t have a retroactive divorce from Gawker’s hijinks. It is what it is.) and Jezebel was-at times- unfriendly to Clinton, sometimes to the…
Michelle Obama never gave you an interview either as far as I know.
I thought the same thing.
Yeah. They should have thought about this before going full on #BernieBro/ #CrookedShillary for the entire primary season.
I think Jez is being absolutely ridiculous to think a presidential campaign would go near Gawker Media with a 40-foot pole right now, but HRC does have a feminist foreign policy. Hillary Doctrine says countries are more prosperous and more secure when they invest in girls’ and women’s futures, and therefore women’s…
Weird, entitled takes are what fucked Gawker Media in the first place.
When the score was Neg. Hill Posts - 90. Positive Hill Posts - 0
totally agree. Anna is one of my favorite writers over here but Hillary Clinton does not owe Jezebel anything. This is a weird, entitled take on what should be a pretty cut-and-dry situation. Jez doesn’t like Hillary and hasn’t supported her (even when they do, they are begrudging) and she doesn’t want to be…
Yeah, I like Anna, but I’m still trying to figure out if this article is low-grade trolling or if Jezebel’s writers are just that out of touch with how Gawker Media/Jezebel is perceived in the wider world. Personally I’m shocked Clinton’s camp even pretended to entertain an interview proposition.
It's your name which really makes this comment great.
Given the decidedly pro-Bernie slant to your primary coverage, it’s not a surprise she wouldn’t want to speak to Jezebel. Add in the fact that you want to tie her to a decades-old and never charged sexual assault her husband allegedly committed (one that Ken Starr even dismissed) and you wonder why you’re getting…
I think she just doesn’t want to meet with any lesbian shitasses.