LOL. If it’s a 787 I’m probably picking another flight. It’s been so beset with issues and the seats installed in almost every single version supplied to the airlines are awful.

Well on a commercial aircraft I don’t want to experience that maneuver. On others, well I have thanks and I don’t know if my organs ever went back the same.

Did you reboot it?

I know, I know, but really all I care about is Chris Pratt. Not sorry.

You are wrong with your cultural colonialism.

Anything that makes brides and their coterie of nattering ninnies SHUT THE FUCK UP is worth it.

I’m fully aware it’s not an investment platform. And for its purposes it does what it should, albeit with a limited amount of regulation of its projects. Caveat emptor always applies.

Good thing your comment is going to cause anyone to reasses and remove the improvemtn.

Don’t know that I’d say it’s that treacherous any more. You don’t try to land aircraft there that are too large to land and take off; that’s just physics.

Do cars fall out of the sky and land on people’s houses? It’s the three dimensional space that’s a concern.

Sarcasm, you’ve heard of it?

But he might one day.

Personally I prefer equity in return for my money, at least when it comes to nonsense like restaurants that think they can buy me off with an appetizer for $100.

According to the FTC, the judgement “will be suspended due to Chevalier’s inability to pay.”

That’s not the gist of his/her argument. The argument he’s making is based on a logical fallacy, that cars and aircraft are equivalent.

How many cars carry 600 people? There’s a pretty big difference between a car and an aircraft.

Have you been to VA of late?

That looks like the color pattern in an oil slick.

Clearly the problem is that you hold up monogramy as an unalloyed good.

Sweetie we’re not talking about a subway, we’re talking about intercity travel. Come back when you know what you’re talking about. Intercity train travel at high speed has not been thusly affected.