Really? Are you fine with the fact that women who are victims are constantly asked to give evidence to support their claim? Or that the women at issue here had mounds of evidence, but were only “disbelieved” after a coordinated series of character assassinations?.

its a true statement in isolation, but its a clear red herring meant to imply that the accusers were lying. By invoking it in this context, HRC is attempting to smear the accusers and play upon the “rape-hoaxes are prevalent” narrative that so many MRAs push and that hurt women everyday.

Even worse, when you realize…

you do realize thats a classic MRA answer. I for one am disgusted at her answer and her smug response to the woman. 1 in 5 of those women in attendance could be victims, and for her to smile, almost victoriously, at the idea that these women should be “disbelieved” is evil

i dont think anything steve jones says is meant for people like you. It’s meant for people who dont time themselves, who don’t train to improve, and who do a 6 week fun run session in order to jog a marathon in 7 hours

cool story bro

he was!

Gronk would probably lose his mind watching Aussie Rules, where the umpire restarts the game by spiking the ball really high up:

not really. We put a compromise in and we “win” and get little in return. Remember when the “more electable” Bill Clinton slashed the social safety net and struck deals with Republicans left and right?

We lose with a principled candidate, we have 4 years to make our case and show the people why they screwed up

omg she is so awesome!!! Her gifs and her snapchats are the best! Almost makes you forget she is a right-wing war monger who adopts positions on social issues only when they hit 51% in polling

oh i feel that. If Joe got in I’d feel better, but Hillarys’ just got too much baggage and integrity issues. The fact that DWS and the party are so obviously fixing this in for her makes it much easier to devote my vote to bernie no matter what

it’s one thing to not idolize, it’s another to be completely cynical and blind to a candidate’s willingness to lie and abandon and adopt new principles like fashion trends

“has pulled her so far left”

And what happens when she runs in the general? She gets “pulled back right again.” The Clintons are frictionless liars, they move to whatever they think is the best position to ride the political winds and will sell any of us out to get more power. History has proven this

2008 Gawkerites: “Always Obama truthers”

Why cant you just admit your candidate is a unprincipled republicrat

how bernie isnt winning this race is a tragedy

a “single state owned network” ....

honestly 100% difference between how richards did and clinton yesterday. Hillary was a pro. Cecille got ripped to shreds. Lets not try to force a false narrative here

yeah a single state owned network, that will work out great. What other countries have awesome democracies with that....

gifts are not free speech under citizens united. thats precisely in the decision and has firm precedent going to buckley v valeo. you shouldnt sneak lies in in there like that

as a syrian refugee i find the idiom “peace in the middle east” very triggering and offensive. Why in this day and age would Rosie ODonnel be so offensive

thanks for saying what i said but much better. These people are absolutley ridiculous. What do they want? Philosopher-kings who don’t have to face elections?