disqustxmmfb3zvy--disqus
Grumpkin
disqustxmmfb3zvy--disqus

It is indeed.

The Jesus imagery was very heavy handed, but it was saved by the levity of Michael Chiklis screaming "Jesus".

Starlight Vocal Band

If you watched the other two why not watch this one? It is 6 episodes so it isn't too much of a time commitment, and at least you can judge the quality of the episodes for yourself.

He collapsed from the heart attack and his head bounced off the edge of a desk.

Actually I'm doing the reverse. I'm attacking the review, not the opinion.

The #Gamergate comment has had me thinking, because in the past several weeks I've made some negative comparisons to #Gamergate myself.

I thought there was a reference in the episode (Mac was talking about what they have accomplished while adding twitter feeds) that suggested the story had been written and later reported by NewsNight.

I'm really not sure what you are trying to say.

Is anyone else incensed over the fact that Jim apparently watched Star Trek from New York to Moscow and somehow is only on episode 4 when Maggie asks him to join the Mile High Club?

How did he fail to do his job? He actually conducted a thorough investigation and got as much of the story as was conceivably discoverable.

Wait… Dylan Farrow…. are you implying Woody didn't rape her? or am I missing something?

The Sons of Anarchy finale is on Tuesday, not Sunday.

I think the only fair way to judge the argument is to watch the episode.It is a nuanced conversation and just listening to the reaction about it doesn't show the depth of the conversation, which is evident by multiple people disagreeing about what the point of the discussion and episode was.

How can you forget the fictional nation?! It's referenced in this season rather significantly. (Equatorial Kundu).

You son of a bitch (or bitch - i don't want to falsely assign you a gender). Took me years to get that one right, and you had me doubting myself in the five seconds it took to ready your response.

I've always had issues with subjective vs objective… which makes my legal career kind of interesting.

As far as the B is concerned I'm saying that Libby's subjective grading (which is her own) would still allow for that high grade, even while disagreeing so fundamentally with the content of the politics. I'm not sure what my grade is because I don't have a system of grading and I don't know how much my reaction to the

I cannot really concede the point about in the Sorkinverse people who push back are always wrong. The character of Ainsley Hayes in particular was always pushing back against Sam Seaborn and but for one exchange about guns almost always seemed to win, and made rational points that often seemed as though they should

In spite of the problems I see with the show I genuinely enjoy the acting and dialogue.