lol shut the fuck you bootlicker

The company was not responsible for setting the time or length of the walk-out. It was organized and executed entirely by the employees. We are not anti-Riot- we are protesting specific policies and practices to make this the place to work we know it can be.

Nice to see the comments already filled with people who don’t understand why unions are important or how workplace demos work and are instead already out here speaking nonsense.

Which is why unionisation is important. With union protection you can actually do things like strike and cause a fuss over shit like sexual harassment and discrimination at the workplace.

Forced arbitration blatantly disregards due process and should be illegal.

And what’s your point, that you’ll only take their complaints seriously if they quit their job in protest? People have bills to pay and food to put on the table. It’s still a pretty damn bold action to publicly protest your employer in front of cameras knowing they could and might retaliate against you down the line…

I like the idea but hate the look. 

I literally explain in two paragraphs how much I think the chests will annoy people and how they ruin a fun part of RPGs. I also put the annoying chests in the headline.

Before people start jumping in and saying “B-but, muh 1st amendment rights!!” without understanding a gorram thing:

From a forum that you run?  You sure as shit can.  

that is actually complete bullshit and yes you can and people do it all the time. Do you...not think people get accounts banned for spreading violent hateful language or ideas? It is extremely common to do that.

Yes you can. Steam is a private service with a Terms of Use all users agree too. If you violate the Terms of Use you can totally be banned. Steam is not a Government, nor a public right, it is owned by Valve a private company and they can ban whomever they want.

Meanwhile THQ Nordic’s decision to host an AMA on 8chan is looking worse and worse.

Until Steam gives a lifetime ban to the email addresses, IP addresses, etc. being used by these people it’s not enough.

They tried to book Sisqo, but he canceled last week when he could no longer see that Thon.

I’m a Federer guy. Before the match, I conceded that if Nadal won, he’d almost certainly pass Fed. He’d be sitting on 18, with the French up next which is practically a gimmee. Then surely, he’d squeeze out two more before calling it quits.

My draft was in before he tweeted that and now I'm very sad that we couldn't include it.

If you were a writer, would you have voted for him? If the answer is yes, then which writer do you volunteer to take a bullet and vote no to uphold your purity test?

It’s interesting to note that the secretary of the Big Beautiful Women Alcoholics Anonymous organization seems to be a man.

“...just didn’t know who they were talking to and it kinda made me angry.”