Check this out:

I was hoping that someone would mention it. It is hillarious on many levels: camo on their helmets + safety vest + cleaning gloves.

What really hate about the whole thing is the oft-seen historical revisionism in various articles and documentaries which attribute the high number casualties to a stronger than expected German resistance, rather than operational failure of the US forces.

Arabs are inept pussies. Nuff said.

It’s missing a huge demolition mortar, for blowing up what it cannot chew up:

I’ve always had an opinion that casualties at Omaha were more due to a bad execution of the landing rather than stiff resistance.

It depends on what your definition of the word stealth is.

I never said I liked it; I actually wrote something like that on the article which described it (or about IRST, I don’t really remember). However, the primary role of that pod is to provide a link between the F-22s and non-stealth aircraft. And I’m sure that it doesn’t slow down the aircraft noticeably, it is only…

That’s a good way to start a day.

The pod is only meant to be used by one aircraft in the formation, but the individual IRST fit (as done on Eurocanards, F-14 and the Russian fighters) can be very useful for ACM, not to mention cheaper and more easily justifiable ugrade than AESA.

That’s an insult to A-7! And if A-7 was nicknamed “slow, ugly, fat fucker”, how would they call Boeing’s creation (apart from whale)? In my opinion, X-32 can only look pretty when being part of a massive explosion.

Since you have touched that topic, I have to say that I was always puzzled about the US’ refusal to use those specialized tanks (Hobart’s funnies) during the Normandy invasion. They were offered a whole brigade of them, and they refused, only taking the DD tanks. Just imagine how many lives could’ve been…

That’s the UK’s legendary health and safety. I wouldn’t be surprised to see British Army artillery crew wearing fluorescent vests and hard hats while pounding the shit out of their enemy.

I afraid I’m not familiar with that (W. Diaz rant).

I apologise for the tone of my language, but there just seems to be no other way to communicate with you.

Did you ever read what I wrote? And your comments are typical whataboutism, deflecting any criticism of Russia by saying “what about” a different abuse committed in the West.

I was simply using your moronic argument against you to prove that you head is in your ass.

Guilietta came in many version including the 4-door, but the most famous are the coupe and the spider ones. Giulia was chiefly a 4-door sedan as its coupe versions were rebadged Giuliettas. That’s why I have always considered Giulietta to be a sexier car, and Giulia to be a small, angry and old-looking sedan.

What about the Russian funding of the radical parties in Europe? And Ukraine is in Europe, so is the Caucasus region (part of it, at least).

Hey, it’s part of the Jalopnik, so all levels of craziness are allowed. But why is it that people often connect Monty Python with nerds?