Keep Guam and carry on?

I think he meant to write, “my Genitals”.

Compromise isn’t in his vocabulary...nor are a whole bunch of other words.

DEMPSEY: Call it
REF: no, see, I’m the ref. I flip the coin. You have to call it.
DEMPSEY: ...call it
REF: Ok we’re gonna need a new captain out here

the reason clint is so ageless is because he realizes that this is no country for old men.

Maybe she put the Freeze on in the bedroom. Hugh knows? She may Nutt be the one to kiss and tell.

Don’t they traditionally cut the cables to the Eiffel Tower elevators when a fascist comes to town?

Absolutely. ABSOLUTELY. He’s surprised he’s thinking about fucking a woman over 35.

At some point, he is going to say “great rack” to a world leader and the GOP will piss itself in defense of his refreshing, non-political language.

That’s absolutely what I do when I meet a colleague’s husband. I hold his hands and ogle him while I say: Look at you hottie, you are in good shape. Then I turn to my colleague and say: He’s in such good shape...so handsome (still ogling). This is completely professional behavior in case you did not know.

When he’s lucid, yeah, I’m sure he’ll sacrifice his son. If he’s having a dementia moment, he’ll probably ask where his son is then mumble and walk away.

Ever since he touched the orb his arms been getting longer

I guess we could exempt people who are just being trollish asshats from the order. Hopefully that would leave it covering folks like Skip Bayless.

At this point, I’m just sick and tired of being sick and tired.

Trudeau: Did he try that handshake bullshit on you?
Macron: Oh yeah, he totally did. Thanks for the tips.

I think this is a case for Shade Court.

“And through his shrewdness he will cause deceit to succeed by his influence; And he will magnify himself in his heart, And he will destroy many while they are at ease. He will even oppose the Prince of princes, but he will be broken without human agency.” - Daniel 8:25 (on satan) and also what the pope was heard…

I’m going to ignore your “It’s about more than slavery” argument, and just get to the point about removing all these monuments. Let’s say we need to preserve a few for historical sake (I don’t think we do, but let’s have the discussion). How many would be appropriate? 10? Maybe 25?