carbohemorrhage
Carbohemorrhage
carbohemorrhage

The law can be enforced poorly without separating children from their families. Releasing them into the US and just hoping they will show up for a court date to be deported is moronic. If they would show up for the court date they wouldn’t have tried to enter illegally in the first place.

It’s on the Democrats because the hard line Republicans have their heads to far up their asses to come up with a bill that has a chance of passing. If the Democrats really want this to end as soon as possible they will give vote for the compromise bill that’s about to hit the floor. Give trump his wall and he will

What they are actually doing is charging any repeat offender with a felony. If they are first time offenders they stay with their kids, get an arraignment where they are told if the plea guilty, they will be released with time served. The kids stay with them almost the whole time, I don’t think the children are

There is no policy to separate children from there parent’s when they cross the boarder. The law states these children can not be held in detention with their parents for more then 20 days. No that we are charging repeat offenders with a felony they will be there longer than the law allows us to keep the children with

I’d be more outraged if I’d never masturbated to Elastigirl when the first movie came out.

1) I’m pretty sure Trump, Sessions, Miller, and Kelly would just prefer these people weren’t trying to violate our laws in the first place.

No country will take them back without a deportation ruling from our immigration courts. The only way for the family to stay together past 20 day once they have been caught is for the family to be released inside the United States.

Rescinding the policy of charging repeat offenders with a felony rather than a misdemeanor doesn’t solve the problem. Doing so means that have to allow the offenders into the country because their deportation case will not come up before the time limit for how long they are legally allowed to hold a child in the

During Obama’s term 4000 children were separated this way when the parents were charged with a crime. The only difference now is people who are repeat offenders are charged with a felony, their case will take longer to process than the law allows for children to held with the parents. If this is your first time

Well the thing with that is Obama’s method for keeping families together was to just let them into the country. The laws are set up so you can’t deport the family together, you can’t detain the family together for longer than 20 days. The only way to keep them together is to release them inside the United States and

You’re half right. There is not a policy thet requires children be separated from their parent. There is a law that states children can not be held in the immigration detention center for more than 20 days. The kids can stay in the detention center with the parents, but for no more than 20 days, if the parents are

I hope this is snark. To equate these places to concentration camps is to suggest Hitler’s worst crime was splitting up families for a few months.

What you can do now is tell your Democrat representatives that Trump has won this round. And it’s time to make a deal on an immigration bill. If people’s belief is as strong as they say. That this can not be allowed to go on. They could have a bill signed by the end of the week that would put a stop to this.

Because the would require holding the children in a detention center with the parents. But the law as it stands is they are not allowed to hold child immigrants who have done nothing wrong for more than 20 days. What I don’t know is if next of kin who have not crossed the border illegally would be allowed to take the

We should handle this like our betters in Europe do it. 

When you put it like that is sounds like they really shouldn’t have drug their kids across the boards of a foreign country in an attempt to violate that country’s immigration laws. A country that publicly stated this exact thing would happen if they were caught doing this 2 months ago no less.

I’ve think I heard somewhere before that when you break the law and go to jail you are not allow to take your children to jail with you. I’m curious why they are afforded any special accommodations to contact their children when if a natural born citizen were arrested their child would just be placed in foster care

I don’t understand the low saturation. Isn’t that what you are supposed to do with a hit ad on your opponent to make them seem like a bad person? The content of the message is almost meaningless. Since the composition shows someone who is not good at their trade. If you can’t even make an ad for your self where you

I see your point. The thing I can’t seem to wrap my head around is that people make all this information about themselves public and then get out raged at the corperations who use that information to try and provide them a service. When it’s seems pretty clear who’s to blame if you put your personal information in a

Making sure people who aren’t old enough to buy your product sounds like targeting ads to me. And if you’ve ever read a Gizmodo post you know targeting your ads is evil for some reason.