Holy smokes. Go cuddle a puppy, helps with anger.
Explore our other sites
Yeah you could, but should you?
brakers
The sad part is they had sources that wouldn’t go on the record. Honestly think they were just looking for a way get this shit out of the shadows.
The alternative is to blindly trust a publisher?
Read BobbyMcD’s comment again, I can’t say it any better.
nah, you’re still wrong
or end up with Harvey Weistein.
I just don’t see how asking readers for information they have on Louis CK in an article is different than asking the comedy scene if they have information on Loius CK over an email.
investigation in public view and investigation behind the scenes are different.
Looking back, the Gawker article doesn’t name anyone (though it could be inferred by the mention of his current popularity and sitcom) but it does tell the same same story of a comedy duo in Aspen as the Times piece.
wait...
Should it be automatically ignored cause the accused denied it?
yeah, see, I never got the worship of him.
it’s really not.
The most predictable part of those comments is the failure to understand the simplest facts of the story.
yet you will make fun of those people and beg for comment-section acceptance from people.
but... Spacey copped to it in his apology, no?
you’re right, there’s no place for fun when words like ‘play’ and ‘game’ are being tossed around.
That... was fun. Thanks
Am I the only one that thinks his pictures are bad?