bostonbakedburner
bostonbakedburner
bostonbakedburner

Heinous

Heinous

It’s not like they’re unaware of the conflict you’ve identified. They are keenly aware of it, which is why you see strains of Christianity cropping up that are all about justifying the creation of personal wealth as something that God and Jesus are very much in favor of.

How do you know when someone doesn’t use drugs?

Don’t worry, they’ll tell you.

Correct, and Hamilton intentionally ignores that in his piece, even thought it’s a topic he has written about many times before. Trump won because, despite the fact that the stock market has reached all-time highs, the workforce participation rate has reached an all-time low. All that corporate value has not “trickled

Killing him would have drawn a lot more attention to the story, which wouldn’t have served her interests. It’s far better to let him fade into obscurity/his mom’s basement.

When they taper

What exactly would he be “thrown out” for? Benefitting from true information?

“Dorsey thought this would be a good opportunity to ask for some user feedback on his microblogging platform from a man trapped in a Russian embassy.”

I don’t hate this. Funny translation aside, it’s not a bad thing that Trump wants to build better relations, and deescalate tensions, with “frenemy” countries like Pakistan and, to a degree, Russia.

The idea that you think this is a “ridiculous claim” is a perfect example of why there will never be consensus on the difference between real and “fake” news.  

I starred this one for my turnip joke, though.

I did not star myself and have never been involved in turnip cultivation or transportation.

“Oddly enough, some Jews don’t seem to mind anti-Semitism so much these days; conservative Jewish organization Zionist Organization of America attacked the ADL for its “character assassination” of Steve Bannon, Trump’s newly-appointed chief strategist.”

Is it really that they “don’t mind,” or could it be that they

Which is strange, because I asked a reasonable question which you dodged - is a government official’s word evidence by itself? I have no idea why questioning official narratives gets me labeled a “paid shill working for Moscow.” Seems like the person adamantly defending the government would be more worthy of the “paid

The word of a government official is enough evidence for you? And you call me a government troll? Try thinking critically.

Why don’t you provide the evidence that Putin was behind any of this, then?

OK, so before I dig up the polling data to prove my point, what is your interpretation for Trump’s victory? Obviously his supporters were too stupid to see who he really is.

Nothing to do with the point I made.

Yet I still see commenters claiming that Hillary lost because of her emails. People are struggling to get by and desperate for change - at any cost.

First of all, there is no evidence tying Putin to any of this beyond accusations from US officials. Second of all, what exactly did Putin do here beyond, essentially, a PR campaign, if he was in fact behind this? Do you think the US doesn’t do the same type of stuff all around the world? What do you think the CIA’s