I hope you circle back to this post in 4 years - after WW3 has not come to pass - and realize how insane this sounds.

Perhaps the worst use of a soundtrack of all time.

“You think we’re post-racial? You think just because gays can marry and we had a black president there’s no more racism?”

The idea that 60M people voted for Trump because they’re “racists” is exactly the type of self-righteous thinking that lead to Clinton getting demolished. Trump won because the establishment has utterly failed the majority of this country - they voted for him despite his flaws, not because of them.

Thanks for not including, “Blame the media for all the FREE PRESS they gave Trump over the past year and the HORSERACE COVERAGE that legitimized his candidacy and positioned him as a mainstream alternative to Hillary Clinton.”

I’ve seen this one a lot today, particularly among the NYT commentariat, and it is terrible.…

I haven’t lost any jobs in the past three years and fall into the same age group as you do. I hope your cover letters don’t have the same frequency of typos/grammatical errors as your Kinja comments.

And alludes to potentially finding something very interesting if he were to cut Ford open.

Exactly. Stay woke.

You’re clearly asking to be praised for your position by posting it in a place where you are preaching almost exclusively to the choir.

Is bringing your five year old to the bar with you on Sundays the most Bills fan thing ever?

Thank the lord we have enlightened men like you to explain these hard concepts to us.

Yup - check out this item from his LinkedIn:

Why “as per” has become acceptable is beyond me. Just use “per”...

this is the most insane argument i’ve ever read

“No one running for office suggesting that our way forward is banning an entire religious group from entering the nation, repealing the right to vote, etc., should be considered because we have accepted that those are not ideals that are acceptable in our nation or as a means of progress.”

OK but that’s different from what you were arguing - which is that certain “bad” ideas shouldn’t even be debated. Obviously I don’t disagree that terrible institutions like slavery should not be enacted into law.

Right here - this is a valid argument, even if I don’t agree with it:

“bad” is a completely subjective term! How can you not see that? Saying something like, “we should ban Muslim immigration until we can be 100% sure that none of them are terrorists” may be ignorant, and I may disagree with it, but that’s a long way away from going “against what this country is supposed to stand for.”

“Some ideas are just bad and shouldn’t be entertained because they’re regressive.”

Controlling the heated pipes under the stadium does not seem like it would be part of the IT team’s job.