bootlegginger
bootlegginger
bootlegginger

I don't know if you're really joking —or playing off your desire to revoke the 2nd as a joke to try to limit the insane gun nuts. Either is fine, but I wish liberals would argue for a repeal —even if just to move the debate further left. Fuck these gun nuts. It's mind bending that there is a right to own a killing

Remember, folks: the only thing that stops a bad guy shooting off a stray bullet is a good guy shooting off a stray bullet, so everyone start shooting in random directions NOW!

i used to stan for gaga so hard, but ever since born this way i just have no desire to ever hear her name again. and now with this terrible shit? go back to paper gangsta, you peaked then.

Good.

Japan doesn't recognise dual citizenship. Japanese naturalisation, once the process is officially started only takes four to nine months. You then have two years to give up your other citizenship, unless your country of origin refuses, in which case you can fill out a declaration of choice of citizenship. Basically

Because it's part of the naturalisation agreement between me and the country to which I am naturalising. Of course, I don't have to give up US citizenship immediately, but I have to within a two year period.

The amount of enthusiasm is also scary. "Going to be a great night!!!" Well, she's not having cunnlingus performed on her, she's not smoking a bowl, she's not watching NFL football, she's not eating a really good meal.

I've always heard it called "depraved heart" murder. I'm trying to recall the details from my criminal law class. I think it uses a "recklessness" standard rather than the "intentional" standard of a premeditated murder. So the assailant doesn't need to intend to kill someone, but they must act with a "reckless

"Munchausen by proxy, fed by social media sympathy"

So he was dehydrated with a little altitude sickness thrown in. A saline drip and a chocolate chip cookie would have made him feel pretty good, too.

He was "literally rejuvenated"... Are you sure we aren't talking about Chris Traeger here?

Um, the dog is three years old, The Kids have had the dog for a month. Get your facts straight before you start spouting off. Also, stop assuming he asked for the dog back, it never says that he did. Please go and read the article properly before you make anymore comments.

He would be fine if he were up front about what is expected, has paperwork signed and everyone is on the same page, but he clearly gets off on exploiting people and getting consent would ruin it for him.

Sena Cech: "I was abused by Richardson when I was 19, while I was working in debt to my modeling agency that sent me to his casting, and I was quoted in the article. "

Just so the people defending him know, THESE are the types of models he targets. He doesn't go after financially secure models with a strong command of

The kids had the dog for a month. The OWNER of said dog has had the dog for three years.

I'm not comfortable with this at all.

The article says the original owner had the dog for 3 years. The kids have only had it a month and it was sold to them against the soldier's will. Maybe you're not a pet person but if someone sold my dog while I was at work (which is essentially what happened here) I'd raise all sorts of hell. This isn't a taking

you realise the OWNER had the dog for three years, right? This family has had it for one month. It is absolutely not "scummy" for this man to want his dog back.

Yeah, sheriff, you're absolutely right. You didn't hear about it when you were younger. You didn't hear about it because it was a 'private matter' that should be left alone for families to deal with because it wasn't right to air the minor faults of otherwise good men.

No, Grudek, we're asking you what's wrong with society that a woman has no choice but to go back to her abuser. Imagine having to choose between living with an abusive asshole or potentially getting murdered if you leave him because the justice system won't protect you. This woman did leave her abuser. And her