bmnegrotto
Dayvan
bmnegrotto

Why are you only basing your judgment on these things? There was no evidence of physical molestation. Two independent groups cleared him of the charges including forensics. The eldest brother talks about verbal abuse from Mia which would be in line with Allen’s version of the events. He also claimed Mia coached Dylan.

An ad hominem is an ad hominem. You can make yourself feel better about being illogical all you want, but you are still attacking her and not her points. Which there is plenty to criticize. While it may be easy to do with a person like Bardot, it is done to anybody with a dissenting opinion, which was my point. And

An ad hominem is an ad hominem. You can make yourself feel better about being illogical all you want, but you are still attacking her and not her points. Which there is plenty to criticize. While it may be easy to do with a person like Bardot, it is done to anybody with a dissenting opinion, which was my point. And

You showed your gullibility. For some reason, you believe the prosecutor who dropped the case, who was going to say what? We didn’t have any evidence to win. Dream on. Despite evidence from the eldest child saying Mia coached the Dylan. Despite Mia showing up for wardrobe fittings for Woody’s next film. Despite the

You would have believed lead was good for you back in 50's.

Ad hominems in place of reasoned arguments. I love the internet.

Not accepted? So they prosecuted him?

He never had sexual relations with her son.

An ad hominem is an ad hominem. You can make yourself feel better about being illogical all you want, but you are still attacking her and not her points. Which there is plenty to criticize. While it may be easy to do with a person like Bardot, it is done to anybody with a dissenting opinion, which was my point. And

“What I don’t understand is how is this crazy story of me being brainwashed and coached more believable than what I’m saying about being sexually assaulted by my father?”

It’s more believable bc it was investigated, corroborated by a witness, and found to be the case.

How feasible would it be to have a movement that helps by having conversations instead of being filled with the usual dismissive types? We don’t all come to feminism at the same time. People shouldn’t be derided bc they think differently than you especially if you are trying to convince them that them to your way of

I never claimed it should be the default, but it is a thing. To pretend it is not is just fantasy. I also didn’t claim you can’t have these conversations before or during. But you are also ignoring the people who don’t want to say “I like to be convinced”. As some people who like to be convinced don’t want to tell

In this world, people actually engage in a sexual foreplay of hard to get. Women do it. Men do it. You may want to ignore this reality, but it is a reality. No matter how many people sign on to verbal consent before sex it won’t happen unilaterally. People enjoy this type of foreplay. I wasn’t there and all I have is