You know why they’re doing this as a movie?

The problem with quantum chess is you can’t capture a king when it’s in a superposition.

I’ve certainly walked out before the movie was over and asked for my money back. And gotten it. Can’t do that with music.

I’d like them to go after modem fees.

It goes into the eyepiece, so I can use all of the objectives in the compound microscope. In this case, 80x.

It is focus stacking. I wasn’t saying they were the same, just similar. And thanks.

I have no access to the ocean, so unfortunately no.

Don’t worry, I knew what you meant.

You know, I’m an idiot. Of course they usually make them in hexagons. For the same reasons bees make honeycomb that way. It’s the most efficient tessellation.

Fair enough. It could be that the hexagon is the standard but they do others or just by chance, all I’ve seen is hexagons.

People there take the term ‘glitter bomb’ much more seriously.

80x. Stupid Kinja put that on a line by itself, so you probably missed it up there.

But that’s probably the bigger pieces of glitter. I’m talking the little tiny ones like that, the ones that get everywhere.

No argument from me, I have a five-year-old.

I realize that. I’m just saying they’re similar.

I take art photos with a microscope as a hobby and this sounds a little bit like what I do with software. I take a large number of images at different levels of focus and then combine them with image stacking software (which is usually used for things like astronomy).

I think you need to read this.

I’m amused by all the people bitching about how similar the two movies are because if The Force Awakens had been unlike the original trilogy, those same people would be complaining about how it wasn’t Star Wars enough.

That’s not done via capillary action?

Well that’s bullshit. This is clearly a disaster FEMA should be on top of.