bananners
bananners
bananners

Well it’s not the type of place society should be allowed to intervene, I think it’s almost a guarantee that at least one person in these types of relationships is dealing with borderline personality disorder. One fool may rush in, but the other person abetting that is often someone struggling with a mental issue they

I am the dude a lot of those women end up trying to bag lol. You’ve heard of SLUGs? It’s all very cheap. People get very angry when you check their bonafides on certain things and sometimes I think you look past the anger to see a mountain of bs. People who are authentically themselves don’t need to make as much of a s

If it was Apple, people would be burning the internet down...while tweeting on their iphones

No more white people and asians allowed to freely compete in college admissions process based on HS performance...oh wait. We already do correct for their advantages (at the very least, as feminists, we intend to), to level the playing field and make it fair. That often means being unfair to a subset of people. That’s

I can already see the orthodox feminist reversal (more like radio silence because a reversal would mean actively interrogating and then being honest about that interrogation) on this issue coming. When your argument hinges on, “Well the world isn’t fair, some people have natural competitive advantages”, you are

Let’s just be clear here. This rule was created by and for the benefit of women. It is entirely in step with what female athletes want. And, if you follow the through line of a great deal of the logic and philosophy espoused on this site, it entirely makes sense that you would discriminate against a negligible percent

Here’s why people care, maybe why you care, and why they hate what’s going down with Grimes and feel the need to shit on it or distance themselves:

I can’t disagree with your experience, because it’s your own, but having played years of co-ed basketball, that leans male (and the teams that win the league and make playoffs usually have no women on their teams, except one notable exception I’ll note later), I really can’t say I’ve experienced any version of guys

Honestly. I’ve got a fucked up sense of humor and have probably made a pedo joke off the cuff (twitter is some folks version of that I guess??) but this many jokes like that in a public forum? I mean thats not being provocative amongst friends for laughs. Really fucked up

Honestly the hills some fuckwits are willing to end their careers on. It’s incredibly important that Ms. Hall had the strength to bring this forward. The only way these assholes can thrive is in the shadows where their behavior isn’t examined. Over time it’ll become impossible to consider yourself decent and behave in

Miller is an asshole. He’s also probably bipolar. But I really don’t know where we’re going to draw the line on this “no assholes in public” line. Because there are a lot of people who are beloved on this site and in the broader feminist world who would be described as first rate assholes, divas, etc. 

Why do people keep saying he was fired? The dude left the show. 

Miller wasn’t ousted. He left. 

I mean politics tend to flow from individual’s personal dispositions/personalities, so there’s really no sense complaining too much, but man oh man Tracy are you serious? This article is as laughable as the way this breastfeeding campaign has evolved. Now you’re mad because attractive women are the front for a

Ffs women attack each other when men aren’t around and it has nothing to do with them. People need to stop pretending it’d all be the yaya sisterhood if men left the planet. Men are told to question systems and thoughts that are convenient for them. What is more convenient for women than thinking all female infighting

Rose McGowan is someone who met her like however many months ago at a public speaking event. Her calling herself a friend is just an attempt to insert herself into someone else’s story. Like the woman who is Amy’s “friend” in Gone Girl.

Err, isn’t this entire site and it’s readership fairly often engaged in what you’re implying is outrageous?

This is an overstatement, but I don’t disagree that the center is not as economically progressive as it should be

This site is latently misandrist. That is it’s base. I get it. It’s a site for women, yeah. But I agree some consistency might make it less vapid. Throw some lipstick on a Bernie Bro and you’re in there

What? The very rich are not remotely the people who argued, correctly, to vote for Hillary over Trump. Ffs are you serious? You’re down with everything Trump is up to? That Hillary wouldn’t in a million years be up to?