Yeah, that's interesting. Still, sometimes something surreal in a movie can come off as silly, like a lot of scenes in the cell, or to me the tiny old couple in Mulholland Dr. This is just a thought, but I think that for the surreal to be horrifying, it needs to be presented almost plainly, and be juxtaposed against…

"veins explode in a pressurized spray of corn syrup and hydrogenated oil"
What an awesome death. Just spinning around and gibbering while liquid gushes out. Maybe like the way lance henrikson died in Aliens.

I only buy food if I don't care much about the movie, or if I'm just really early and sitting in the theater.

Also, since it seems to be incredibly important so far, is knowing different architectural styles of houses that important to understanding the book? Because I don't know shit about that, so I have absolutely no idea how to picture in my mind this fucking house they live in, which is apparently comprised of about 50…

fuckin Little, Big
I'm about 65 pages in. Is the rest of the book as floridly ornate and obtuse in it's descriptions? Do the characters get better? The premise seems so interesting but I can't get through this crap, it seems like theres nothing to latch onto.

Evangelion is great. I stuck with it because it seemed to me really different from any anime I've ever seen. In obvious ways it's exactly like every anime ever (chosen one protagonist, giant robots), but it's world, characters, and especially the evangelions themselves are written as physically limited in so many…

I don't see how one couldn't be completely addicted to the show by the end of episode 3, probably overall the best episode of the series, and a hell of a place to be so early on.

I love Falling Down, its an awesome movie. But while I agree with a lot of what you guys are saying, that it's about d-fen's point of view, I do think the movie's muddled. Its true that it's hard to determine whether Douglas is supposed to be the bad guy or the good guy. If it's about his point of view and wanton…

Oh shit, that made me laugh.

There's a lot of obviously intentional innuendo in the interview questions. Highly bankable? More like highly boinkable. I'll give her a role and turn her inside out.

mama took them batteries
DANANANANA
she took em away
DANANANANA
mama took them batteries
Siiiize double A!

Well, there's still the Bear and the Bow to look forward to, now titled Brave I think. I'm really hopeful for that one.

Electric Guitar Solo! Wyooo wyooo wyooo woooo!

Thanks for bringing up Wait till your father gets home. For years I've been trying to recall which show that I saw 10 years ago in the early morning hours on cartoon network was the one I was pretty sure Family Guy completely ripped off. I was starting to think reruns of the Banana Splits had made me hallucinate the…

But they recently experimented with hand drawn animation in that Day and Night short film. I'm sure they have some hand-drawn project in the works.

Yeah, thats a great short film.

I hear the comic is good, and I'd like to read it, but I can't get past the art. I find it really unpalatable. It looks like Humberto Ramos's art if he suddenly got really, really lazy. I'm sure I'll find the look of the show easier to digest.

Finally coming to their senses.

I assumed it would be something stupid like, in the fantasy world, she's battling a dragon or something, but in reality she's just trying to pick a lock on a door. But also, when she escapes the mental institute in real life and kicks Jon Hamm or whoever in the balls, in the fantasy world she gains self-worth and…

Yeah, but what does it take to be a "fun" movie? Does it necessarily have to be campy, like Drive Angry?