How is it moot? The argument is simply defining the action. Just call it what it is: a bug.

Intention doesn’t matter. The hurdle is there and I am capable of jumping over it. If I jumped over it, I didn’t cheat my way around the hurdle. I just managed to have a good jumping technique. It doesn’t matter that you would prefer me not to, what matters is that I’m physically able. Meanwhile, if there’s a hurdle…

As a former QA tester, I would have filed a bug report for this. Accessing any part of the game you aren’t intended to at a given moment is a bug. It doesn’t matter if you’re using game mechanics to get to the location. The simple fact that you aren’t supposed to get there makes it a bug.

Yeah. Refused to run at all on my $1500 pc. Crashed when finding a match. Maybe when it stops being early access it’ll be optimized and working, but I am thinking the hype will be long gone before then.

Pfft. This is one of tens to hundreds of thousands of such cases. Go have a stroll through Africa.

Time to allow millions of uncultured and uneducated refugees flood the first world spreading pestilence and plague.

Fake News Author Angry About Fake News Tweets Getting More Attention

Only in crime statistics, in order to make it seem like white people are committing more of them.

Only one skin tone? Racist.

Please no. We haven’t learned to drive in two dimensions yet.

Oh please. It’s not like he’ll somehow overturn gay marriage or some crap. But you are right about one thing. You and the rest won’t learn from your mistakes. You’re going to end up electing Trump for another four and you all deserve it until you learn.

There’s still a few village idiots defending the democratic party for fielding a candidate who wasn’t more likable than fucking trump. How are you lot this inept?

There’s no failure to recognize anything. I acknowledge that you think Clinton is preferable to Trump. You’re failing to understand that to myself and millions of other americans, they are equally bad. The only objectively better option was to not vote for either one. There’s no reason for me or anyone else to vote…

If chicken and beef are both poison to me, and chicken is specificially poisonous to 63 million others and beef is specifically poisonous to 63 million others, I’m morally wrong for voting for fish?

Religious nutjobs aren’t running around brutalizing people. At least no more than they already were. You’re being dramatic and projecting nonsense to try to fit me into your narrative and narrow world view.

Your analogy is bad because from my point of view and from the point of view from millions of others, we’re deathly allergic to both options. So we all go hungry no matter what happens, but at least we voiced that we wanted fish and that it was bullshit that fish wasn’t an option on the menu rather than sat quietly.

No different from a Clinton one, as neither one represents my interests.

I mean, the gov could actually ban human presence in business on that day aside from essential services.

But there’s value here. Clinton’s a shitbag, but she’s a shitbag who will stay in office for 8 years because she’s clearly untouchable by the court and we get status quo for the next time and America slowly erodes away. America won’t crumble because Trump is president. He’s disliked by most and can absolutely be…

This is a dumb shit argument. A vote for someone not in the top two is absolutely not a wasted vote. It’s not a protest vote. It’s not symbolism. It’s a vote for, hopefully, someone you’d want to see be president.