WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.270 --> 00:00:03.300
- On this iPad is a random
car, we're gonna debate it.

2
00:00:03.300 --> 00:00:05.267
- [Narrator] You're
watching "Jalopinions!"

3
00:00:06.540 --> 00:00:08.790
- Chrysler Sebring, bad.

4
00:00:08.790 --> 00:00:11.010
- [Andy] Terrible, bad,
poor build quality.

5
00:00:11.010 --> 00:00:12.060
- [Steve] Video over.

6
00:00:13.230 --> 00:00:18.230
- But cheap convertible therefore not bad.

7
00:00:18.540 --> 00:00:19.920
- [Steve] Fiat 500, better.

8
00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:22.230
- You could fit actual
people in this car though

9
00:00:22.230 --> 00:00:26.490
and also a Fiat 500 has
comparable build quality.

10
00:00:26.490 --> 00:00:29.820
Did you really just
say another FCA product

11
00:00:29.820 --> 00:00:31.020
as your trump card?

12
00:00:31.020 --> 00:00:32.580
- A way better FCA product.

13
00:00:32.580 --> 00:00:33.660
- But, no.

14
00:00:33.660 --> 00:00:34.890
- [Steve] It's a better size.

15
00:00:34.890 --> 00:00:35.723
It looks better.

16
00:00:35.723 --> 00:00:37.230
- A better size if you live in Europe.

17
00:00:37.230 --> 00:00:42.153
Here's the thing, Steven,
we live in America.

18
00:00:42.990 --> 00:00:45.420
We don't need a car the size of Fiat 500.

19
00:00:45.420 --> 00:00:47.880
- No, we need more cars
the size of a Fiat 500.

20
00:00:47.880 --> 00:00:52.500
- A Chrysler Sebring, its main
issue is not the size of it.

21
00:00:52.500 --> 00:00:53.460
That should be like the-

22
00:00:53.460 --> 00:00:54.933
- That's one of many.

23
00:00:55.800 --> 00:00:58.140
Also the fact that it looks like trash.

24
00:00:58.140 --> 00:00:59.580
It's a bad looking vehicle.

25
00:00:59.580 --> 00:01:01.350
- Yeah, my dad had one of the Sebrings

26
00:01:01.350 --> 00:01:02.340
from the late nineties.

27
00:01:02.340 --> 00:01:04.020
Those were cool looking.

28
00:01:04.020 --> 00:01:05.730
Yeah, no, it was okay.

29
00:01:05.730 --> 00:01:06.563
- No it wasn't.

30
00:01:06.563 --> 00:01:08.370
- It was on the Mitsubishi platform.

31
00:01:08.370 --> 00:01:10.020
- That doesn't make it look good.

32
00:01:10.980 --> 00:01:12.270
- Are we thinking of the same car?

33
00:01:12.270 --> 00:01:13.980
The one before Michael Scott's.

34
00:01:13.980 --> 00:01:15.060
- I don't know what Michael's...

35
00:01:15.060 --> 00:01:16.800
Do I look like I watched "The Office?"

36
00:01:16.800 --> 00:01:18.990
- It's not a good car, but
if you want a convertible

37
00:01:18.990 --> 00:01:20.400
and you don't have a lot of money

38
00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:21.427
and for whatever reason you're like,

39
00:01:21.427 --> 00:01:23.490
"I don't want a Toyota Solara,"

40
00:01:23.490 --> 00:01:25.920
this is not a bad car for that,

41
00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:27.633
for that very specific person.