WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.237
- Name's Bond, James Bond.

2
00:00:03.343 --> 00:00:06.740
- [Narrator] Who should
be the next James Bond?

3
00:00:06.840 --> 00:00:08.375
Here are some of Io9's choices

4
00:00:08.490 --> 00:00:11.044
of who should play our favorite spy next.

5
00:00:11.160 --> 00:00:13.614
Rege-Jean Page.

6
00:00:13.710 --> 00:00:16.416
The Bridgerton breakout
star has got it all.

7
00:00:16.515 --> 00:00:19.753
Charismatic personality, a
great presence on screen,

8
00:00:19.848 --> 00:00:23.423
pretty decent to look
at, and he's British.

9
00:00:23.516 --> 00:00:25.792
Plus, he's only 34 years old.

10
00:00:25.890 --> 00:00:28.061
He could play Bond for decades.

11
00:00:28.140 --> 00:00:30.297
- And handsome, must not forget that.

12
00:00:30.392 --> 00:00:32.399
- [Narrator] Lashana Lynch.

13
00:00:32.490 --> 00:00:34.568
- I'm here as a professional courtesy.

14
00:00:34.650 --> 00:00:35.802
- [Narrator] Sure, "No Time to Die"

15
00:00:35.882 --> 00:00:39.273
gave us Lynch as Nomi,
Bond's replacement as 007,

16
00:00:39.339 --> 00:00:42.109
but it also spent as much
time showing her kick ass

17
00:00:42.178 --> 00:00:43.844
as it did trying to navigate

18
00:00:43.912 --> 00:00:47.648
that she wasn't really
007 in anyone's eyes.

19
00:00:47.700 --> 00:00:49.316
Why not give Nomi the actual chance

20
00:00:49.376 --> 00:00:51.451
to shine and flesh out her story,

21
00:00:51.510 --> 00:00:54.388
having to navigate no longer
being in James' shadow

22
00:00:54.434 --> 00:00:57.791
while inheriting his mantle for real?

23
00:00:57.858 --> 00:00:59.463
Rupert Grint.

24
00:01:00.570 --> 00:01:03.864
It's 2022, why can't a ginger be Bond?

25
00:01:03.990 --> 00:01:05.566
Grint has shown he's got range

26
00:01:05.670 --> 00:01:07.234
with a surprisingly powerful performance

27
00:01:07.339 --> 00:01:09.503
in the Apple TV show "Servant."

28
00:01:09.600 --> 00:01:12.539
And we still want reparations
for how Grint got done dirty

29
00:01:12.649 --> 00:01:15.509
as movie Ron, which is
generally a useless version

30
00:01:15.614 --> 00:01:16.893
of book Ron.

31
00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:19.580
Michelle Yeoh.

32
00:01:19.690 --> 00:01:23.750
Once again, we are begging
people to hire older women

33
00:01:23.847 --> 00:01:26.253
to take on legacy action roles.

34
00:01:26.340 --> 00:01:29.323
Now yes, we know Michelle
Yeoh was in 1997's

35
00:01:29.432 --> 00:01:33.694
"Tomorrow Never Dies" as a
Chinese spy that helped Bond.

36
00:01:33.780 --> 00:01:36.630
But why not have her go
from Bond girl to Bond?

37
00:01:36.720 --> 00:01:39.199
- He has to work with
women who are capable

38
00:01:39.270 --> 00:01:41.068
of doing the things that he does.

39
00:01:41.160 --> 00:01:42.970
- [Narrator] Michelle
Yeoh is an action star

40
00:01:43.050 --> 00:01:44.237
in every sense of the word

41
00:01:44.312 --> 00:01:46.773
and a powerful presence on screen.

42
00:01:46.860 --> 00:01:49.810
If anyone can take on
007's M.O. of kicking ass

43
00:01:49.867 --> 00:01:53.133
and breaking hearts across
the globe, it's Yeoh.

44
00:01:54.210 --> 00:01:55.263
Henry Cavill.

45
00:01:56.160 --> 00:01:57.084
- Henry, I don't know if you know this,

46
00:01:57.137 --> 00:01:59.386
but the Bond position is vacant.

47
00:01:59.446 --> 00:02:01.121
(Henry laughs)

48
00:02:01.260 --> 00:02:02.956
- [Narrator] If anyone
deserves a shot at the role,

49
00:02:03.090 --> 00:02:05.392
it's Superman himself, Henry Cavill.

50
00:02:05.520 --> 00:02:08.695
He dealt with the sloppy mess
that is DC Warner Brothers,

51
00:02:08.816 --> 00:02:12.299
and also killed it in
"Mission Impossible: Fallout."

52
00:02:12.420 --> 00:02:14.368
Plus, he has experience playing a spy

53
00:02:14.490 --> 00:02:15.469
in "The Man from U.N.C.L.E."

54
00:02:15.595 --> 00:02:17.371
which probably won't get a sequel

55
00:02:17.494 --> 00:02:21.408
due to his co-star Anthony
Hopkins, oh, I mean Armie Hammer.

56
00:02:21.531 --> 00:02:23.844
Who would you pick to play James Bond?

57
00:02:23.959 --> 00:02:25.233
Comment below.