@katypee001: Agreed, but I would like to take a look at the new display. I just don't think that a pretty panel would be enough to make me lower my expectations for the rest of the unit.

@kelz: Any minute now...

It won't be as big of a deal as it usually is - this year's WWDC was a snoozer. We'll be done with it later tonight.

@jellotime91: I am only stating what it would be worth to me. As a longtime Apple fan, I am accustomed to the way they set prices. That's part of the reason I am not buying an iPad.

@W10002: I'd buy it in a heartbeat for $199. At $299, it would be worth consideration. They need to prove to me that it isn't just an iPod Touch with a bigger screen.

@Wrathernaut: I'm interested in this as well. I have about 9 more months on my AT&T contract...

@phunnyballs: A low score would be in the 400s or 500s. I don't think a number below 400-something is possible... #creditscores

@ahbi: In the good-old days of cameras that used actual film, the film was rated with an ISO number that indicated how quickly it could acquire an image. For consumer apps that involved sports in nice daylight, ISO 400 would have been typical. You might use film with a lower ISO rating for portraits, where details…

Oracle looks like they are going to try to monetize every last possible dollar out of the various apps that Sun owned. It won't end well.