Young_Griff
Young_Griff
Young_Griff

OH WOW THANKS HOW BIG OF YOU

No! Don’t do that!!! Neither Guild has called for a consumer boycott, and until they do any sort of cancellation is literally negligible! If they do call for a consumer boycott, it’s important to do it en masse and AS A RESPONSE to their call, to show their support. Doing it now achieves nothing, even if you tell the

“Now Link, it’s time for you to find the sword that binds evil… The Master Sword!”

Unfortunately, Nintendo has been a little indirect in its messaging about how Breath of the Wild and its sequel slot into the established chronology of Zelda, because according to producer Eiji Aonuma and director Hidemaro Fujibayashi, they take place at the end of the timeline, but which of its branching stories it

Zelda just appropriated Link’s house because she’s royalty and can do shit like that without repercussions.

congratulations you can buy ONE piece of gear.

I want to experience the game more than I want to grind rupees. 

This getting cancelled was a definitive example to me that Netflix was becoming a trash service with trash content. As the article says this was, and remains, one of the best Fantasy series in years - and perhaps the better Dark Crystal story, if I’m honest.

Honestly, if the US drones are as crappy as they say, it’s a win-win. Caught on fire in a squad car? I say we propose a bill that mandates at least 5 drones per car!

I’m so,so behind on my watchlist, and there’s so much material out there, I will 100% bail after one or 2 eps if I’m not feeling it.

The two worst takes on the internet:

From a straight up quality standpoint, I must confess: I don’t think this video looks as dogshit as everyone is saying. That said I also don’t think that it looks incredible or like animation. The article puts it very well in saying that it’s AI assisted rotoscoping - except animation on a rotoscoped project still can

Whoever insisted commercial art isn’t art is an asshole that doesn’t respect labor or craft.

It’s literally the exact same people pushing this. And of course they’re recycling the same tired arguments. If they were creative enough to come up with new arguments, why would they need AI?

Overtly defining AI-generated images as “plagiarism” seems like a slippery slope that could lead to any art provably influenced by another person’s art as plagiarism.

That’s fine but we don’t have UBI and if fiscal conservatives have their way the next pandemic will kill every worker in existence, assuming they haven’t been ground up by the robot that replaced them. It’s all well and good to push for a utopian existence when capitalist psychos aren’t trying to bankrupt everyone who

Oh my God. If you’re going to parrot leftist rhetoric, at least try and understand it.

Here’s my regular reminder that you people have a problem with capitalism, not a problem with technology. All this pearl clutching over displaced artists completely misses the point that in a just world, the artists could continue to make their art without the threat of poverty and new technology like this wouldn’t

Told you that these corporate/tech bro shills are trying to turn creative human labor obsolete through AI. There’s a reason they’re trying to criminalize artists in general - they’re forcing an ‘easy’ and ‘ethical’ narrative that benefits only them. For instance, they call artist “privileged” because they built their

Well, Disney DID film shows back in the 90's at Disney MGM Studios (before it was renamed to Hollywood Studios), and we know that DeSantis lives in the past, so...