Okay, one more time.

I’d also side-eye (sweet verb) anyone who buys these. Surely a collector would spring for the real thing.

For someone who hates trolls, you sure do like to feed them.

I’m not commenting on the morality of it. I have little stake in the matter, and whatever reverb would affect me is minuscule. I’m just talking from a legal aspect, which really, is what’s most tangible. Would Nintendo really spend money going after a small game shop that has one section catering to a niche audience…

Mmm, they hinted at this not being true. It being Blizzard, it most likely won’t be.

Just for perspective’s sake, let’s go down your rabbit hole.

I just haven’t finished modeling the sinking ship players have to escape from while defending their view on keeping the Condé Nast piece up.

I feel it’s an angle that definitely does infringe upon the creators and publishers, but we’re talking SNES games. It probably exists within that legal space where it would take more money to really go after anyone, and it wouldn’t be worth it.

You mean you’ve seen people act entirely in ways in accordance with the size of their penis, which you’re also intimately familiar with?

That’s worse. And also, what I wrote was accurate; he did defend a view on keeping the piece up.

Would your comment here earn a warning? It’s technically off topic.

What an inaccurate, trite response.

Everything’s trolling these days. What a lame way for you to convince yourself I’m wrong.

“Pulling the post didn’t solve anything or hide it from existence,” he wrote in a comment on the condemnation post. “I would have preferred, if anything, to have seen that article remain online, but surrounded with frank and lively debate by readers and staff.”

It’s the weekend. What do you do, work?

Everyone accepts me. I’m beloved everywhere.

Do you genuinely believe penis size correlates to the way people act? Seems like a dumb thing to do.

Never implied the former, but continue to have that argument in your head for all I care. Critique comes from the Greek word “kritikos”, meaning to discern or judge. A critique is usually more more focused on the art form and how the piece fits into it or doesn’t. A review can be a critique, but typically happens when…

The author of this article defended said piece. This weekend, Hulk Hogan is the bandana’d elephant in the room. Why not come here with that, brother?

Oh hey, another person who conflates everything with “trolling” if they disagree. What’s that like? Probably something similar to people who still go for the “small penis” insult in this day and age.