@WampaCow: You are right. I have watched Avatar in both formats and felt a completely different sense from the experience. The idea of immersion, at least for me, was felt with Avatar in 3D and no movie has done that or has even come close to that since then. Your argument about the animated films is a separate…

@meatbag_pussrocket: I saw it in standard format (DLP) and still enjoyed it greatly. Maybe the 3D would have created another level of enhancement, but my argument is if it wasn't shot like Avatar, then how immersive could it be? I keep thinking of how poor the 3D was in Alice In Wonderland and hesitate at the…

@robcapazzi: Unfortunately it will not work for you in the video. Only in a theater setup like the one they showed would it work. That's why the captions were in there to let you know when the ad appeared.

@MauricioHavok: I personally "think" (know) it's Photoshop for a few reasons, one being the odd tattoo in the picture. It just doesn't look like a coherent design and the placement is quite strange. A tattoo artist would know better though. Secondly, even with the lighting the woman's ass looks quite flat, yet her…

@applefandan: I am assuming they were going with automated or unmanned craft. Plus, it's just two craft. The scramjet that launches off the rail and into space carrying the rocket and then the rocket itself carrying a payload or astronauts which separates from the scramjet at 200,000 and continues its mission.

@MauricioHavok: You sure the photoshop isn't the real lie?

@HeroOfTomorrow quit smoking: And to think, this all started around some comment for a $3,600 bicycle... You have a point there. I think we take ourselves too seriously to be politically correct that we lose sight of things. This whole group of comments being the case and point.

@chsmadden: I don't know why I want it so bad in the U.S., but I do! Maybe because it's time for an affordable Italian coupe here .

@Stem_Sell: I applaud you on that one!

@Fossa: Well, physics lesson aside and disregarding the serious injury he would have sustained the video is a nice piece of VFX trickery.

@hawkeye18: Does someone need a hug? You are right though, you just don't need the anger.

@Jonee: I am just speechless...

@bröke: Are you just trying to make bro fit in there? Seriously, Oldsmobile and Buick?

@Gigglebox: As awesome and unsettling as this is, the kid is actually cuing the cameraman for his camera move. Apparently for whatever reason it was the only way to notify the cameraman of the correct moment for the move. Being that the kid is so young he makes it very obvious and creepy.

@Octomac: That was my first thought too. I think it's the side windows that have a similar shape to the new Camaro. If it's not that, then it's something.

@Christophe Franco: Honestly, I feel that Ikea is obligated to return items, even damaged ones. I purchased a wardrobe from them last year and upon building as per directions the thing tore itself apart under its own weight. What I realized was that they used the same directions and hardware for the small wardrobes…

@derilium: You mean "clearance". I take it this guy is saying that sale prices aren't actually sale prices. So in theory you would have gotten 30% off the original price, not the clearance price. Which is a pretty big difference in money saved and feel good discount you would normally have.

@OMG! A SeaMonster!!!: You are right, it may be viewed as a chick car, but the Abarth version makes it tougher. Plus Michael Schumacher drives one and I would trust his judgement on cars.

V-8's can bring world peace. There, I said it.

@aek8: Just curious then, but what do you consider groundbreaking CG and a film that had better 3D?