LH must pay really well if they have become your “go-to destination for men’s basics.”

LH must pay really well if they have become your “go-to destination for men’s basics.”

Except that’s the entire point of taxes. The company pays back into society for all those privileges through state and federal income tax. It’s not like they’re just getting a free ride. They’re paying workers and training fees and insurance and utilities etc. etc. etc. I understand the basic concept, but again,…

The primary fallacy in this argument is this though: This assumes that the person in question didn’t also pay in to the roads, to the schools, to the police and the fire department. They paid in as well. So, negating that, it boils back down to the same thing. I should have their money because I want it.

Well, if we’re going to be honest here, when she “hoards” her billions of dollars that money she doesn’t prevent that money from existing. It’s not in a massive coffee can buried in the yard. That money is banked and invested, and others are able to take advantage of that capital to do things like buy homes and build…

You think the Walton’s keep their money in secret vaults somewhere waiting for inflation? No. That money is, in large measure, invested in new companies, ideas and ventures. How else do you think she gets richer. Its not simply by sitting back, she puts the money to work making more money. Sure, some of it is in…

Triggered over this is ridiculous. Its actually a clever AND funny joke. Great editing.

Your response alone is justification enough for this joke. It appears to have landed precisely on target.

I’m more upset by the fact that they didn’t go with “Uncle Drewniverse.” RIGHT THERE, LOU.

Counterpoint: the Uncle Drew ads are fine.

Rich people are not entitled to safety or property rights.

He really is an insufferable prick.

Well see, the important thing to understand about the guy who typed this edgy three sentence blog post is he’s a fucking moron.

Yeah but as a rich celebrity she’s not entitled to things like privacy and untheft

“No one was harmed.”

Don’t you know? Hamilton has donated every single cent he’s ever earned to charity.

Per Gawker policy, the only way to be financially successful is to be an awful human being who will be up against the wall come the revolution. Nobody ever comes by money through honesty, talent, or hard work.

Hamilton envies people who can afford $2m worth of jewelry, and he ascribes independent moral significance to his emotions.

The problem is that she worked for her money and then purchased the jewelry.

Good point, HamNo. I’m sure the criminals will pawn the jewelry for 100% of it’s value, retain a small amount of the cash for rent payments and daily needs, then donate the majority to the local teacher’s union.

I’m waiting to hear what the issue is with having $2m worth of jewelry.