Last night, the New York Times published an editorial written by Christopher Surpun, a “Republican presidential…
Last night, the New York Times published an editorial written by Christopher Surpun, a “Republican presidential…
You can’t really dunk on your opponents in hockey, but Sidney Crosby got about as close as you can when he pinged a…
Russell Westbrook can go from stationary to licking the backboard in the span of one or two nonchalant steps. He’s…
I’m all for environment, but watching major cities develop is not ‘destroying the earth’. Cherry picking sites and pictures to sell a narrative, and I mean to literally sell, is the opposite of journalism. It’s sensationalism.
Don’t forget gays sent to labor camps.
Depends on who you voted for. I voted Hillary and actually enjoyed this article, even if it’s not satirical. It’s a good balance to this site and all of the other Post-Gawker sites.
What was the purpose of this post other than mental illness click bait? “Look, here’s a guy who hit rock bottom, how fascinating!” No context, no story, just “funny weird picture that will get us traffic.” He’s not in the public eye anymore so definitely not newsworthy. I love Deadspin but come on, this is the kind of…
We need diversity in who owns the media outlets as well
“It can be hard to put your finger on exactly what you fear most about the rise of Donald Trump: the racism? The sexism? The xenophobia? The profoundly dangerous lack of judgment?”
I woke this morning extremely confused. In theory as a Repub I should be happy, but I’m not. I can not believe the country could possibly be this stupid, but yeah actually I can.
He’s intelligent, popular, and didn’t have to pay Hulk Hogan tens of millions of dollars.
On the other hand, you’re bloggers who “Spend the Day Ripping Lines From Reddit,” so let’s call it even.
So what? The guy make good original tweets using facts sourced from wikipedia, the biggest crowdsourced encyclopedia that everyone uses, again what’s the big deal with this?
Hm. Not too sure what the problem is. You can absolutely source your tweets to Wikipedia, because they’re tweets, not academic papers.
The internet has made one of the most passive forms of entertainment in existence, television, utterly fucking exhausting.
I’m totally okay with The Concourse (this is not Deadspin) regularly covering current events as it always has. But the bulk of HamNo’s “analysis” lately has indeed been lazy and sketchy on facts. Which is a shame, because sometimes there’s a good point hidden under all the nonsense, but I’m facepalming too hard to dig…
There’s some sweet question begging going on here.
JFC...