I think any dooferhero created for "sponsored" comics is de-facto part of this list LOL.

It's possible that since the HB armor has much higher energy requirements, Tony added supplemental ARC-reactors...?

Also of note is that this battle possibly occurs in the same (possibly Johannesburg) non-U.S. location that the "city explosion", "sad Cap", and "panicked people in traffic" shots...

The bigger plot loophole that I took away from DoFP was: Assuming that your plan is to prevent Mystique from killing Trask (a feat she attempts by using a firearm), why would you go to Paris to prevent the shooting WHILE LEAVING BEHIND THE MAN WHO CAN RUN FASTER THAN BULLETS AND PUSH THEM OUT OF THE WAY?

I don't know about anyone else, but to me, those "webs" appear to just be the smoke trails of tiny particles of the burning substance are hurled out of the bowl by the violent boiling, not unlike sparks from a sparkler.

My choice for "other than saber" light-weapon:
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Lightwhip

I'm wondering if calling it a robot is perhaps inaccurate. Why would a robot need to breathe? Perhaps it's more an encounter-suited biological alien...?

Wait...who DOESN'T want to buy that bottle of rum?

Judging from one of the promo pics I saw of Sam-as-Cap, I believe he's keeping the Falcon wings, so at least some modest changes to the costume have to be made to accommodate. Also, they have made changes to the costume almost every time someone else donned it, so why not?

Medusa has been around for AGES...She's been known to fill in with the F4 on occasion and (IIRC) was/is married to Black Bolt and is/was Queen of the Inhumans. She has prehensile hair.

Also, highlighting Inhumans over mutants for the Avengers allows them more characters to be able to work into the Cinematic Universe, since Sony still controls the movie rights to most major Marvel mutants as well as the term "mutants" as it relates to Marvel properties (if I'm not mistaken).

It's called Vajazzling. Get your terminology right. :)

This way, they are preserving and restoring the original look of the overall castle, while simultaneously placing in protected storage (one would assume) the original piece of art to keep it from deteriorating any further.

Honestly, I don't see how this is all that much creepier than a kangaroo's pouch.

Personally, I would opine that calling Pollock "great art" is a bit of a stretch.

Having grown up in South Jersey, my father had me convinced for a good chunk of my childhood that the Navy had buried a destroyer and left the conn tower sticking up. (p.s. to assist people in finding it, it's spelled Moorestown). :)

Both of the geographic regions can claim prior art. ;)

Disagree. With the advent of the Internet, people feel increasingly free to express themselves, which is a good thing. However, people need to realize that there are social consequences to their speech. People have the innate right to spew whatever mean-spirited vitriol they want, but the people who find it offensive…