You say this without a hint of irony. I find that just as intriguing.

Now I'm not sure if you're still trying to insult me or give your biography. As your replies get shorter and shorter, I continue to be bored.

im surry i dunt know what ur talking about because i'm not a loser like u. im jus chillin at 2 in the morning, hangin out wit my friends who r ttly lauging @ u as i type this n sip beer. we're all sup3r models and we're ttyl hot. we're also mensa level geniuses n we have phdz in physicz n engennearin.

Nah I don't, brah, because you're fucking nuts. But I'll stick with my nice mental image of you grinding your teeth, because it goes along with all the lovely psycho text you just typed out (and continue to type out), just like you can assume I'm being "passive aggressive". Assumptions make winners out of everyone.

Oh man, now that's more like it. I can just hear you grinding your teeth while you punch that out into your keyboard. I just wish everyone else took commenting on Gawker as seriously as you did. The world needs more people wishing random death on strangers on the internet.

Awww, that is a lame ass comeback, even for you. You could have easily spruced that up by going the "Go snorkeling in a burning oil spill" route or "Go scuba diving in a burning oil spill full of pirañas, you smelly cancerous whore shit cuntbag"... heck, what am I doing, I can't do your work for you. F,…

Ahh, then I apologize. Maybe you should have used a couple more "Smelly shitcunt" insults to make your point more clear.

Ohhhhh okay, so you're just going to keep telling me how terribly un-smart and uncultured I am as you continue to respond to my every reply to you instead. I guess that works too, ImeanwhattheheckI'mboredenough, amirite?

Mhmm, *tsk tsk* you're losing your edge there, buddy. You need throw in a couple of "cunt punching fucking cunt" and "punch your fucking fetus" for it to measure up to your comments from last time. You're getting warmer, though. I'll give you an C- for effort, but you can do better.

No, I just thought it was hilarious. I don't know if you've caught on yet, but I really don't take any of this shit seriously. I'm just here to goof off and have fun. Anyway, I'm not even mad at you, bro. Don't sweat it.

I didn't read what you've babbled on about just now. So are you gunna tell me how you want to punch me in the cunt like last time or what? Well? I'm waiting...

Yeah I know. Dubai has a ton of infrastructure problems. Most of their buildings violate tons of construction codes but like most places in Asia, it's developing so quickly that it's trying to adapt to it's newfound wealth. I'm just always surprised by how seriously people take this stuff.

Actually it does matter, because there is no real answer and I was asking a rhetorical question. I get by now that it's your schtick to misread intent, though. Clever, really...

I'm not responding to the graph, I'm responding jabba's comment on how the WTC's spire is "pathetic".

Rofl, I like the 2+3=Cats at the bottom of that photo.

Why do people insist on turning this stuff into a competition?

My feet were tingling like crazy. I felt like pausing and taking a walk halfway through the video. I hated the parts where he balanced the camera in one hand while standing on that Star fixture. Urgggggheee...

Mhm, yeah. If that were to happen, I'd imagine Portland could potentially get heavily populated as well.

Yeah I know. Still...California in general has a bad reputation for contaminated beaches (From Avalon Harbor to Santa Cruz). I dunno if focusing on SoCal alone will solve the water issue. This is also in addition to the fact that in breaking up California, you may end up with states that are highly underpopulated…

Ah, I was going to mention that I wasn't too sure how true my statement was, but thanks for posting this. I knew California was stealing water from some place. So now I'm not sure whether breaking up California would help solve the state's water issues or not. Maybe it would just complicate things.