Gazelem
Gazelem
Gazelem

1. The character shown in the trailer is not wearing Link's traditional green outfit

Above all these I would rather see a Mara Jade stand alone movie to introduce her to the overall movie universe.

I find your lack of Thrawn disturbing.

One of the first rumored Star Wars stand-alone movies was a homage to Akira Kurosawa's Seven Samurai, in which a group of Jedi would defend a village (planet?) against a large group of marauders. Still sounds good to us.

I dunno, the first trilogy clearly laid out a mythology that implies the Force was something far more spiritual than it was any sort of "science so advanced it is basically magic" sort of thing. That was my whole beef with the midichlorians. They took something that was designed to be mystical and turned it into the

I believe this is supposed to be a new game in the Mass Effect universe, and not exactly a direct sequel with Shepard and the rest.

Well, if they're listening to the fans then they all know what we really want...

No, most known from Aliens.

Ok, a two-parter, so I'm slightly cheating:

I'd love to see a fantasy show spin-off of "Advanced Dungeons & Dragons." It wouldn't have the Community gang in it, except for the occasional voiceover. And who wouldn't want to see a kick-ass female warrior named Hector the Well-Endowed?

After hearing how bad Final Frontier was for years, I have to say I did really enjoy it when I finally did watch the film. It's not a big actionny blockbuster, but as a character piece it worked well.

Great list, but you missed these morons! God-dammed packleds, what a stupid set of villains.... "he will make us STRONG" phhhbttt....

"God" may have been a disappointment, but Sybok managed to do something really quite frightening and impressive: he turned both Spock and McCoy against Kirk.

It is a ludicrous idea because it'd be better to make better use of photovoltaics than putting them in the worst possible place.

There's a difference between something like the trans-atlantic cable and solar roadways. The first is an engineering feat, that people thought simply couldn't be done. No one is arguing that it's not physically possible to make a solar roadway, they're saying that it's a terrible, impractical idea. No on said "don't

Solar roadways aren't a bad idea for some time in the future. They are, though, well-known to be an impractical, even impossible idea to implement right now, or even any time soon.

His point was that the simplest part, the glass, is very expensive. Would it make a difference if it was just one trillion? That's still way out of range for road costs. Then add the solar cells (very expensive) and electronics (not cheap) and the 20 trillion is probably still on the low end of price range, even with

Yeah, lets make a terrible roadway that doesn't make any electricity and costs $1000 per square inch. Good idea dude. Sorry but "solar freakin roadways" are a terrible idea.

Engineering is what establishes what works or not. If what you are proposing works on paper (stress loads, duty cycle, material costs, labor costs, platform stability, expected bottlenecks, maintenance, etc), then you test.