I have to disagree with the Nissan R390 and Toyota GT1 being on this list (3rd and 2nd at Le Mans respectively). Podium finishes are failures now?

“Lasers are everywhere these days, whether it be in your CD player, your cross-cut saw in the garage, or in the phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range which disappointingly your local gun store doesn’t keep in stock.”

Of course. Sorry to all the Chris’s out there. In my defence, I’m not the only dumbass out there, as I googled “Chris Rock and Jackie Chan - Rush hour” and got a few results...

“But if it wanted us to think that its sound system was fun? Well, then it would make up its own ridiculous name, really.”

Why does he have Chris Rock’s voice in this clip?

This list will get really long if we have to consider all the cars which didn’t come first in a major endurance race...

Fortunately, I didn’t have to recall. My memory is too poor, so I used Wikipedia :)

Porsche AG = Rothmans. True, they weren’t there.

#OK

Streaming to you soon! #LHmusic

Based on this photo, I’m definitely giving this guy all my money.

The best teams with the best drivers were all there. Your definition of not-top-flight seems to refer only to the cars they were using. Winning Le Mans is always a big deal.

In 1998, Nissan was able to finish 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 10th overall, being beaten only by the Porsche 911 GT1.

So, what’s wrong with the name Vito? It’s a good name. A strong name...

It won.

So, a podium at an endurance event still means it’s a failure?

Yeah, sorry about that. Back to schule for me!

2nd at Le Mans in 1999 (after qualifying 1st, 3rd and 5th)

“Although not the first attempt at using a turbine powerplant in auto racing, the Howmet TX was the first and is still the only turbine to win a race,^[1] earning two Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) race victories and two qualifying sprint victories during its only year of competition.^[2] The TX later set six Fédérati…

Hur hur. You said “LeMons”