For anyone wondering how this compares to a Fire TV and Android TV.

For anyone wondering how this compares to a Fire TV and Android TV.

One positive point: The wipers were being considerate after the crash. I mean right on cue.

The reason you do this is simple:

I have no problem with polyamory, but please spare us the evolutionary biology mumbo-jumbo, it's complete bunk.

I'm so sick of the narrative that being monogamous is somehow not part of the human condition. There are lots of people who have no problem being monogamous, and who actively seek it out. Just because your relationship doesn't work like that doesn't make it an unrealistic expectation. Do your thing, but leave the…

See- I would have been very, very interested to see an interview with YOU. You seem ethical and cool. I am decidedly monogamous- I don't really "get" the poly lifestyle but I don't see anything wrong with it (it mostly just seems exhausting to me, but hey, I am old and settled ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

She made it everyone's business when she agreed to have this interview published. Hence a comment section. To comment.

I tend to agree that the other spouses don't know. I understand she left a lot of detail out but that might be the first detail I would include. I mean, the whole interview is her telling us it's all right because her husband knows and accepts it but she just happens to leave out her partners are in the same…

well, i can agree that getting actual statistics on the 'success' of poly relationships is virtually impossible so all we have is logic and our *personal* experiences

You don't need to cite something that is evident. Obviously not all men have this desire, but if it wasn't built into our biology, then the species wouldn't exist.

Listen man. You do you, ok? If two people are happy and consenting, then that's all that matters. It doesn't matter whether they're gay or straight, mono or poly, vanilla or kinked. Whatever.

I absolutely don't believe in monogamy.

If he needs as much caretaking as it seems, he doesn't really have much of a choice. Its either acquiesce or lose your wife and caretaker.

"Yeah, I think the fact that when he found out they didn't just call it quits and they found a way to make it work for both of them was particularly beautiful."

I don't think it's very fair to say "most relationships would be better if they were non-monogamous to some extent." YOUR relationships might be better, and that's awesome. But that's not true for everyone. Some people are truly happy being monogamous.

We are hardwired as humans to seek out multiple partners for so many reasons.

I don't consider this ethical non-monogamy. It's nice that, with her husband now aware of her other partners, he supports her lifestyle. That is indeed an open relationship. However, the fact that all her other partners are married - and probably NOT all telling their wives that they are seeing another woman - means…

I find myself at odds with the notion of "natural human condition". What is that supposed to mean? Its about priorities. I value loyality way more than having sex with different people and so wouldnt ever cheat. Of course if you believe that its human nature to cheat, you have given yourself already a first…

Don't you mean #FISTworldproblems? I'll see myself out (slams door).

I've been thinking along the same lines, but truck based. Their chassis lend themselves more to the modularity.