ElleEmm
ElleEmm
ElleEmm

If all Allen had said was "women can be awful to each other, too," that would have been a legitimate point. Women are not superior to men, we also have thoughts and emotions that are not always good. Women can be awful to each other, just as men can be awful to women. But Allen is trying to say that somehow the way

I think that this guy maybe knows 5 people. Because nobody he knows discriminates against anyone, ever.

I have to go with Catwoman (because duh, Catwoman) despite my belief that the coat looks similar to what grows on damp porches in the summer. However, I would wear the HELL out of the rest of the Blond's collection.

Aw, crud. Thanks!

If you never updated to iOS 7 (because you fear change/are lazy) is it still necessary to update? Or is the error only in the iOS 7 code?

I think it maybe means that people who buy in bulk and then resell are making it impossible for individual customers to buy the individual products. If the store runs out and has to restock because of bulk buyers, then the individual customers can't buy goods directly from the store and have to decide to either go

Scary Spice. I believe my love of leopard print gave me away.

I admit that 20ssf could have been referring to selective elements of Moses' statement, but without a clarifying addition ("And that's why many of us believe Moses regarding his childhood abuse" for example) I can only guess at his/her intentions and take it as a blanket statement, meaning that some believe Moses

Thank goodness! Hey, fellow feminists, sexism is over! Because one woman has succeeded at making more than her male predecessor, sexism in the business sector has been cured. Half of the Fortune 500 CEOs will automatically be replaced with women, the gender disparity between workers and management will be balanced,

I think it's important to remember that even if Mia was a horrific mother, that doesn't mean that Dylan is a liar. You can dislike Mia without questioning the experiences of an abuse victim.

Part of me is super excited. Part of me is going "...congrats on catching up to the past 30 years of fandom, guys."

I actually have the opposite experience most of the time. If I have a wad of cash in my wallet, it seems easy to just take out bills and pay for things without keeping track until everything is gone. When I have my card, I have a clear statement of how much I'm spending at each place, and how often.

Are we reading the same threads?

I can understand that. And that would certainly be one way that the artist could have taken the idea of genderswapping. But that doesn't make this version any less valid of a concept for genderswapping, which is what most of the people who are upset that the characters are not "butch" enough are basically saying. It

I can see where you're coming from, but I think that the two different complaints are really representing two very different versions of criticism. The lack of originality is a critique of an artistic practice (like, "I think that anyone doing a painting of a blurry lily is just rehashing Monet") whereas "These

I don't know why you're so sure that I'm referring to any criticism other than that which is specifically complaining that the figures are not genderswapped "enough." If your problem with these pieces is that you think the concept is overdone, then I can grant you that as a valid angle of critique. If your problem is

I'm so glad to see that so many people know exactly how a man is "supposed" to look. God forbid men be androgynous, or even worse, effeminate. This artist is obviously not sure what gender is, and we must all tell them what they are doing wrong. It only counts as "genderswapping" if you go from Pamela Anderson to

Making gifts out of hair was really popular in Victorian England, especially as a romantic gesture. There'd be jewelry, pictures, clothes, all kinds of stuff. They also liked to make stuff with hair from dead people as a way to remember those that passed away.

I feel like Lori Petty and Yoga Jones (aka Patti Mayonaise) are secretly sisters.