I immediately knew, from the last time this sort of thing came up, that eventually there would be counter articles saying how it was just a layman's misreading of the TOS's.

To me, this outlined more than anything, the biggest drawback is that it's not really built well into phones.

I was referring to the reviewers, "I don't like it" response.

We make exceptions to all the amendments. There are limits for our ability to peacefully assemble, I mean, just look at the Occupy protests. Then there are of course in general limits to freedom of speech.

I saw some of these negative responses online, which again I do not understand.

We have exceptions for every constitutional right. We limit free speech in certain circumstances. Everyone generally seems fine with this. Yet somehow gun advocates think the 2nd amendment gets magical exemption from nearly everything? I'm like, if gun adovates, the NRA, had the same dedication towards anything other…

I hate how down people are on the 48 FPS.

So what you're saying is that, our poop has evolved into alien moon beings? Right?

This has always been what Google tries to do. The easiest way to see it, is with the auto suggestion.

I thought that Fancy Fast Food proved all this: http://www.fancyfastfood.com/

I have one string of LED lights, but my favorites remain the big bulb multi color incandescents.

For all of these applications, I get excited about them, I download them...then I stop using them. Until Apple allows real integration (which will probably never happen), I don't see the worth of these types of apps.

I was under the impression they don't know a lot about exactly why SIDS happens...let alone if this would help.

To me, as great as it is that they are moving forward with their perception of what is real and what isn't (ie flying angel lanterns), it still shows the flimsy nature of christianity/religion.

Yes, I'm at work and they don't let me install a single thing. So this is great.

One of the things I've learned through the years, is that sometimes it's worth just paying a few bucks more to avoid the hassle of this sort of thing.

Kinda weird though...truthfully Brat Pitt doesn't really do high budget action flicks.

I know what you meant. I just was just turning your argument against you.

I have completely enjoyed brainstorming a way to actually compromise on this. I've liked entertaining the idea, that would say, "we get unfettered access to the first four and a half months of pregnancy, and we'll concede the last half as un-viable"

I kind of think that this is a cop-out. Voting is important. Who we elect is important. I would like to think that Gizmodo, would be able to champion a candidate they perceive as being the most important in aspects related to technology and science.