True. But shouldn’t that come from Natasha/Hawkeye and not them reminiscing at the end?

Space. Sharks.

I think the subtext is that Natasha loves the Avengers as her family, and is sacrificing herself for them. She is doing the opposite of what Thanos did, which was a selfish act.

Wow.

Baby Yoda you put that mercenary down NOW!

CJA!

This is the content I live for.

Now I’m sad again :(

Oh damn.

Nah. It’s more fun to never object, and then when it’s time for closing, show the Jury that we wanted them to hear everything, unlike Plaintiffs, so they can make an informed decision. Plaintiff wanted to show a very specific and limited version of events, while we wanted the Jury to have all the facts so justice can…

As an attorney, I AM OFFENDED.

But if the Klingons and the Federation were competing to fill the gap, it could lead to strained relations or a breakdown of the relationship to the point of blows.

Maybe the “failure” isn’t the rescue operation, but the Federation’s actions after the disaster, when the Romulan Empire collapsed. Instead of trying to help or maintain peace, they try to take advantage of the situation and alienate their allies, including the Klingons, for a quick, shortsighted gain. Maybe this is…

RIGHT??

I think the Russo’s said that Cap simply gave it back to Red Skull. The exchange (a soul for the Soul Stone) was permanent. However, he was able to simply give it back.

I love these!

D:

We learned, though, that Scott wasn’t traveling through time, time was traveling through Scott. So no new timelines were created.