CommenterFromBoston's saved articles

I’m of the opinion that sharks do not eat people entirely often enough.

The reason no one mentions the dead man’s crimes is that they are irrelevant to the way he was treated while in custody. 

Hey kiddo, six figures isn’t really ‘fuck you’ money, so lay off that hot take. Learn to be a decent human, I don’t see money being an issue unless you make it an issue (which you clearly are). I’d work on bringing something else to the table like humor, respect, humility, and general interest in your date.

People have been talking about this thing like it’s the spawn of Satan. I’m not a Starbucks support (only because I’m not a coffee drinker), but at some point people need chill, right?

Is it the color scheme that’s getting people so worked up? I mean, I get it. It’s fun.

Unicorn frappuccino doesn’t have coffee in it.

I like to imagine there was no costume changes at all, thats just how he showed up to set.

I have one too; it’s part of why I watch House Hunters (although the hunters and I have very different taste). I like to pull up listings of the kind of homes I like on Zillow and just drool over them.

I play “If I had ten million dollars, which house would I buy” whenever I’m walking someplace fancy.

Great work. Although it might have been easier to get to the truth if you had set up a...

Or they could have confiscated it had it tested proved their assumption correct and arrested the kid. There is a wide canyon of possibilities between your two scenarios

I’m not sorry, but you’re the idiot. If there is suspicion that an item is not what it is, there are test kits. Either confiscate or let it through or test it. You don’t force the person to drink it to prove what it is or isn’t. If it’s not admissible in a court of law, it’s not a valid test method.

Your honor, the…

If Hernandez would’ve just raped a couple women instead he would’ve gotten away with it.

Maybe now they’ll do the honorable thing and bring back the rum ration.

Right? That was definitely picture where it would have made more sense for him to be the topic of the article and his settling downward.

It really shows how subjective looks are. I thought they were all okay except the environmental lawyer who was pretty gorgeous and hiliariously, the boyfriend of the “stunning beauty.” I also like how essentially they were all saying that they have dated supposed 10's before but now they will deign to go as low as 8…

Right? He was attractive!

His fiancee had this to say: “When men get to a certain age, they realize that it’s important to meet a life partner that they connect with,” she says. “Looks fade.”

Rephrased to be gender neutral: