I am not blaming or scapegoating it though? I am saying it could have contributed, he could have been a racist/misogynist but without untreated manic episodes perhaps he doesn’t attack women (although I agree that is still a super low bar). It is hard to strike balance for sure though.
Explore our other sites
Doandroidsdreamofelectricsheep
91jmay
100% i agree with that, it’s a hard balance to strike though.
bipolar has no impact on remorse or empathy though? I 100% agree with 2nd part though, people need to forget the idea that mental health is same for each person - same disorder can be totally different in two people. I am suicidal and cut myself when I am manic, some people gamble/spend loads of money they don’t have…
what a great response to help prevent more situations like this occurring.
For sure I agree with that, idk if needs to be ‘alleged’ as he admitted it and won’t stand trial.
Feels like a poor answer to be honest. I have bipolar and am not violent but some untreated bipolar people are. It’s not excusing him to point out society doesn’t give a fuck about MH unless it can be used to as a talking point. If you ‘shrink the excuse’ is that the best way to stop these acts of violence and…
I am kind of torn here. Mainstream media always notes the mental illness of white men when we do stuff like he did but then feminists always push back on that, so what is correct response here? I have bipolar and i’ve never hammered a woman in the face (such a good ally) but finding this one difficult to sort.
I got that impression as well, Fall is good show but idea that is some kind of barometer True Detective must reach when it is comfortably better already is odd.
agree, dialogue is low volume.
that’s fair, I was almost certainly a dick in my post but that’s just me at the moment. I do think it changes context a bit though still.
those are all fair points, but none of that nuance was found in earlier comments.
It was 3 or 4 words and seems to me to completely change context of what he said. Fair enough though, still stand by the point you’ve decided series is shit for women until proven otherwise - although that is probably fair given first series just ignored women.
It seems it’s been decided this show is terrible by you but I thought this episode was v good, much better than first. Although given large part of the piece attacks a single line, I’d have thought you’d have bothered to get it right.
Well I don’t think anyone disagree with that and would accept the are lying, perhaps he is but given Kate Hudson has admitted her Mom also is in part to blame I don’t think it is total one direction thing.
that’s a lot of caveats, I also know from personal experience that parents who drag their kids through court rather than working amicably is harmful but that never gets mentioned.
What does any of that mean? She allegedly cheated on him when they were together.
I don’t even know who he is, just read the interview and hate how ridiculous the comment section here is. Lol saying bye like you are relevant at all and I give a single fuck about your opinion.
Lool who are you
In this case you could well be right, he claims she used to take them out of state on his visitation dates and Kate Hudson has said her mom is partially to blame but the idea that the ability to fight a legal battle in court is open to everyone demonstrates some serious class privilege. Dismiss me as a troll if u…